1) "PSYCLE SENSE sm": new:

We now see a batch of new puttables gainers so far, in sec. (5), as I specifically easily suggested recently to seemingly deaf ears among all my followers, as usual....AND, as we like to experience often, a bunch of new Longside Gainers for you, simultaneously, neat....plenty of Buys remain here for you to take advantage of....on both sides, at once....

note, as ''the 95 %, and media and analysts who needlessly missed the initial, EZ rises since 9/21" now go more bullish, sentiment-wise, neither the DJIA nor the NASDAQ indexes are above recent recovery highs....hmmmm....points out the importance and value of I.G.-specific, stock-specific trading, vs. indexes, as I have said for decades....and the value of our Puttables, several Techs of which are falling as well, already, independent/regardless of 'index movements', yes ? and, the value of specific stocks trading, as an alyways-doing adjunct to index trading....IGR continues, split market, nice....

always try to also VIEW charts of the ones we 'just miss' to learn the patterns even further, as they were also given herein specifically as well, yes ? more proof of "PSYCLE sm" power/value....

2) "What's Been Said, and What I've Read":

a) Important Industry Group (Rotation) notes:
1) as the often-late-wrongwayers began going bullish again on them, my adding 'oil service stocks around their 200 DMA's', seems to have been right on, as usual, you're welcome.... 2) the Russell 200 index has risen ABOVE its 200 DMA....surprise....hence my recent track record of so many secondary/tertiarie stocks rising, yes ? you're welcome....but the S & P has still not yet done so, probably puttable around the 1161 area ?, with close stop above, still....eh....not our cup of tea.... 3) and, who was the first/only to give Semis/Techs/Comp./Storage/Data stocks right from/at 9/21 lows herein ?, you're welcome....watch for those who only 'buy only higher only after obvious breakouts' to return, leading to possible normal 'overshoots', before pullbacks erasing new buyers' gaiuns ahead likely, yes ? the pattern rarely changes....

4) viewing a recent chart of the 2-yr. and 10-yr. Treasury bond yield, both actually still show possible rolling tops in yields, i.e., not yet a new high in yields....hmmmm.... 5) now, many of the incorrect-as-usual analysts who liked HAL and KM near highs, finally go negative on them - only, as usual, after big drops they hurt their overpaying clients in, - at recent lows....the pattern rarely changes.... 6) gee, who was the first/only to give out some extended Insur./Banks as puttables, now starting their fall ? ....7) my showing a valued client charts Thu., we saw a bunch of double-tops among Techs....just more, exploitable I.G. rotation, to take advantage of, yes ? ....7) but looks like I may be incorrect with having Railroads/trucking stopcks on potential Puttables list, no biggie, never did anything yet herein or otherwise, anyway....but, of ocurse, I was again among the first few to give out depressed Airlines at their post-9/11 lows, for you, yes ? re-read my IGR booklet....

b) more, misleading, sensationalized, Late, and/or improper/incorrect comments from the Financial Media, Reporters, etc.:
1) in their usually-near-perfect contrary super-bullishness, recent L.A.T. front-page headline, "Video Game Sales Poised to hit Record", tells you where those stocks, like, ATVI, MSFT, THQI, ERTS, AKLM, are likely to fall to (oops, I gave it away), ahead.... 2) 1/1/02 front-page headline, L.A.T., "Tax Selling sends Dow tumbling 115 points", is also wrong, misleading, and incomplete - as usual....gee, was there no 'tax-selling' near Sept. lows ? and, why report that just on the last trading day only ? so, I guess, all the 'tax-selling' which did occur, sent stocks UP since the lows, yes ? B.S., dgms.... 3) same front-page, "Limited Demand for Commercial Office Space in LA", was evident....again, I would say, 'well, duh...." but I woould point out that, with I.R.'s so low, builders are looking to build relatively cheaply.... also possibly increasing supply, dig ? and, same issue, headline, "Apartment Market to Soften Moderately in LA & OC....many landlords are evicting tenants who cannot afford to pay rent".....next....meanwhile, the Calif. sales tax % rate rises another 1/4 %, thanks for nothing, govewrnment....

4) recent front-page LAT headline, "trying to avoid big tax hits from company options....whether or not value of shares has plummeted", proves my opinions on corporate greed and shannigans (dgms), and, yes, the last 2 years many people were 'Broadsided by options granted by their employers creating taxable events even if not cashed in or the stock fell in price." I don't know much about ;legal stuff in this area, but just the fact that this can hopppen, proves my teachings and beliefs....taxing 'aper profits' is ridiculous, but the wealthy should have known and have been educated better....but then, they have still not well-enuf learned my "PSYCLE sm" tenets, nor cycles-stages in general, ay ?

5) and, Fri., actually heard a CNBC idiot reporter mention, "well, we finally have our Santa Claus rally", and, of course, B. Griffeth begins the 'January Effect" wasted verbiage....if I had a buck for every incorrect reference to that BS one....

c) more incorrect/misleading/sensationalized, and/or improper comments, from Fundamentalists/Companies, newspapers/magazines, etc., vs. illogical/Contrary/Unlinkable, past/present/future Economic items, and/or stock price moves:
1) Thu. at close, CNBC announced that "natural gas supplies in USA are rising, when they historically should be falling, seasonally...." Gee, where are all those wrong-bulls-I-reported-would-be-wrong-again-at $ 10.00 N.G.", now ? FYI, around $ 2.50 N.G. looks basey for future rise, not fall, ahead, soon, dig ? ....2) as expected in my "PSYCLE sm", a recent study in Silicon Valley, whows 'a slowing rate of dot-com failures' recently....the 'failure rate' was as low as 8/00, dig ? they say that 7-10 K internet companies are still operating....ionteresting, huh....responding to an argument that this shows the davstation is over, analyst said, "that's like saying that a decline in rabies is due to more dogs dying"...touche....FYI, 'only' 537 dot-com co.'s died in 2001, adding to the 225 which failed in 2000....not that many, wouldn't you say ?

d) more, likely late, incorrect, and/or misleading, comments, from Brokerage firms, NL writers, Analysts, economists, Money Managers, etc.:
1) uh oh, Thu., CNBC at the close, and all over finl. media, announced that, "investors and analysts are getting a LOT more bullish about technology stocks"....also, recent front-page L.A.T. headline, "higher fear threshold makes investors braver, less worried....disaters have not been able to rattle global markets much, for long....previous feeling that 'everything has changed forever' no longer in vogue as much....it now takes more to frighten investors....panicking investors are disappointed...." also, 12/30 headline, "market confirms hope for the future....analysts regain power, after taking much criticism all the way down (well, duh - me)....issue many new buys, vs. lows of Sept. sell opinions", which also is a sign to run for the hills normally ? and proves my "PSYCLE sm" yet again....FLW ?

e) more general, political, misreported items proving why one should probably ignore 95 % of everything else out there:
1) shame on all those idiots for evidently recently chastising the hugely-wealthy for "dontaing smaller amounts in 2001, than in 2000", according to the L.A.T. on 1/1/02 article....gee, Gates donating 'only' $ 2 B, and G. Moore 'only' $ 2.5 B, and the Stowers 'only' $ 1.1 B, etc. in 2001....yeah, right.... these are the very kinds of entrepreneurs who should be lauded, but dgms.... 2) and, thanks again, Govt. and Airline ind., who are instituting a "security fee' of $ 10 each way, forward, on flights....wonder how that $ will directly 'solve' problems, as all the other measures have/not.... 3) more 'big brother', as O.C. decides to track 'sex offenders' by satellite with elec. devices....boy, I dunno, gotta be a better way.... 4) and I am sure y'all have heard about some families of those perished in WTC situation, complaining about the $ WE are paying them.... aside from emotional element and perspective, I always felt, that if one fails to buy L.I., that's one's own decision in a free market, yes ?, they should be happy egtting anything, dig ? also, questions about how to achieve parity in payouts adds to the nonsense....this may set a bad precedent, even tho we are all saddened and upset....how do you see it ?

5) a great editorial in recent LAT, "let the market deal with MSFT", correctly points out many studies showing that "market forces are much more powerful than any legal actions of threats....states should back off from attacking MSFT." there is little or NO historical evidence that forcing big companies to change stuff, helps the L.T. marketplace....witness the continual leadership changes with the video game, pPC, online svc., ISP, internet browser, beverage, spirits, photography, electronics, paper, diaper, detergent, industry groups over the past 50-100 years....MANY new companies/entries have exclipsed previously-thought-of-as-impenetrable companies, dig ? and better products/services have emerged over time, yes ? how do YOU see this ?

So, as you have seen, for years now, how well one does, often, just "doing" the best 'individual' stocks, and rotating Ind. Groups, chart-technically, and sentiment-wise, mostly long-side, while ignoring, or going contrary to, 95 % of all Media messages, and "indexes/averages" comments, from the peanut gallery ? By just getting my output, alone, you do much better, and save time, by not having to even try to "seek, and process" tons of other, useless fundamental info., anyway....and we also help remove potential emotional problems for you, before they begin....

3) Most recent Hypothetical "PSYCLE sm" transactions, to be mimicked, and referred back to:

Always remember to view "1-year-at-least past" charts of everything you can view, herein, along with their 200 day moving averages (DMA's), to "see/learn" the "PSYCLE patterns", and see where/when stocks in section (3) were Hypothetically bought near lows, and put near highs....all % percentage 'Gains' are just logical ESTIMATES for L.T., ITM options, where exist, and/or on Margin, where no options exist....