1) "PSYCLE SENSE sm": new:

I was thinking about how negative 'the 95 %' are gonna be over the weekend, manifesting in V.S.T. weakness early Tuesday today....even my 'cable guy' who visited me Fri. said, "every stock looks lousy, huh...." And, of course, that great-contrary-indicator financial-planner-guy who I-have-mentioned-herein-at-those-times-herein, the guy I who gave us 3 previous great market turns (him wrong, me right, as usual), actually was less bearish over the past weekend - late/high, as usual, dig ? But, in good L.T. news, he still hangs to his "NASDAQ to 1,000" tome, which he espoused on the way up last year, and around the 9/21 lows....other brokers I communicate with, are depressed enuf to warrant not expecting too much longside damage ahead....and, of course, they will again miss the next spate of bottoms, yes ? and none of them have any Puttables, as we do herein....

Of course, this pulback will be temporary, as usual, and will give us tons of nice long buys ahead soon, and plenty of Put gains in the meantime, yes ? But some longables have broken or cracked, for QSL's....as usual, just as 'the 95 %' decided they wanted to 'start buying'....I have devoted my entire career trying to help show, teach, etc., nice, deserving people, how to try to act Before trends even appear, use IGR, act opposite sentiment, use stops, often be more fully invested, trade long AND put-side always, ignore or act opposite of 95 % of other 'external items', add money after occasional rough periods, and lower one's risk and emotion, making the whole process easier most of the time....all to take advantage of the normal, usual, easily-identifiable, doable, sequential pattern(s) which have worked so well most often in the last few decades....

In mentioning the recent kinda-bullish I.I. NL % figures are from the same mostly-lame-o's who hated stocks at the lows, when we bought big-time, they are/were recently kinda similar to those of March 2000, before that decline.... interestingly, there were a plethora of Insider Sales among tons of NASDAQ stocks into/after recent rallies....rare, and correct so far....hmmmm....yet I did not hear this/that reported anywhere publically, dig ?

so, we have a little rough patch lately, after doing so well for so long lately....this too shall pass, and we have our many Put Gains to balance/protect, yes ? Hopefully, the basers and double-bottoms still around, will generate usual longside gains ahead....but Tue. 22nd the most difficult time I have experienced in a long while....tons of stocks now have slightly-rising basing-sideways triangles, whose 'since-9/11 uptrends and/or bases' may be cracking/aborting....At least all my people have cash balances and were given tons of Puttables....the above said, I am assuming a similar resolution to what happened after drops last Spring, and 9/11, in similar patterns....be ready to pounce....Last, note some 'fobd's' are appearing already in sec. (4), perhaps proving my thoughts already....hmmmm....hopefully confirming my 'good L.T. after this period' concept....try to recognize your internal sentiment well this time around....so you can catch the puts and longs even better....

always try to also VIEW charts of the ones we 'just miss' to learn the patterns even further, as they were also given herein specifically as well, yes ? more proof of "PSYCLE sm" power/value....

2) "What's Been Said, and What I've Read":

a) Important Industry Group (Rotation) notes:
1) well, the QQQ finally brokedown, as expected, for our puts, below the 38+ area, and actually may project down towards the 34+ area anyway, in steps ? ....2) just a potentially-exploitable quickie, as all the analysts who loved TYC at each high when I spcifically gave it 2 U herein as a put around 60, now dislike it again, on 'the bad news out there', as it forms another (triple ?) bottom in the near-40-ish area....hmmmm.... 3) interestingly, the "defensive index' with consumer, trans, aero/def., household, bev., ideas in it, actually looks higher.... 4) and many Biotechs, and Tech.-Techs, look beautifully buyable, after they finish in-media-res pullbacks....another good L.T. sign, as I have recently inferred....this is why sec. (6) list is growing, dig ?

5) note the reversal to Puttable, of several big-name Drug stocks....and a growing sec. (7) puttables list as well, in our continuing 'split' market, ay ? ....6) and do not ignore my you-heard-it-here--first call on some depressed Japan-oriented stocks...already have some Gains....

b) more, misleading, sensationalized, Late, and/or improper/incorrect comments from the Financial Media, Reporters, etc.:
1) in a rare valuable article, Jessica Talati, in Futures Mag, tries to explain the differences in fundamental and technical analysis, and proves my "PSYCLE sm" (again) along the way, even though she does not damn fundamentals at all (dgms), but shows no real examples, as I have over the years....for anyone anywhere to assume they can monitor, measure, get accurate figures about, every single, of even some, of the plethora of company, industry, national, intl., etc., fundamentals on anything, never mind weather, govt. stuff, is utter waste of time and resources, especially when one can quickly eaily discern at least 2/3 to 3/4 of all future moves and current patterns to be exploited, often at little cost as well.... 2) Tue., in a new low in ignorance and misleading, CNBC's Obrien/Bauman, 9:45, talked about companies which are - get this - "not exposed to the economy", as supposedly an argument for buyting cyclical stocks....dgms.... Gee, exactly which companies are not exposed to the economy ? amazing, huh....and they get overpaid fopr such drivel ?

c) more incorrect/misleading/sensationalized, and/or improper comments, from Fundamentalists/Companies, newspapers/magazines, etc., vs. illogical/Contrary/Unlinkable, past/present/future Economic items, and/or stock price moves:
1) a new semi-useless book (dgms), "Toward rational exuberance: the evolution of the modern astopck market", suggests that no 'market time with a supposedly high historical PE" can be 'overpriced', if that PE level, or index price level, is exceeded thereafter....citing "the market before the crash of 1987 was not overpriced, nor in the 1999-2001 period", which is just weird and wrong, but at least he mentions sectors finally just a little bit at the end....he expects the S & P's PE ratio to "continue its secular increase, even if, say, the NASDAQ's index price never makkes it back up to 5,000", which, again, is useless, helps nothing and no one, and is itself irrationally exuberant....tell that to the trillions of dollars in losses, real people had during 1987+ and 2000+....a lot of dough can be, and is, and has been, lost, I say, in the meantime/during wrenching declines along the way, yes ? making this book kinda ridiculous....

d) more, likely late, incorrect, and/or misleading, comments, from Brokerage firms, NL writers, Analysts, economists, Money Managers, etc.:
1) I have been receiving Bear, Stearns research for a while, and, gosh, they are no different from all the others - buying only high/late, selling or going negative only after big drops and/or near lows, no stops, almost no technical chart pattern aid, and often liking what I liked at bottom, only higer, and vice-versa....'nuff said, but perhaps I will be able to help you by fading their stuff, forward, so I thank them in advance.... 2) recent Multex NL, as usual, is late to the move, citing, "the news just keeps on getting worse for thw Wirless sector, downward spiral, etc." - but of course, we know better, and look to buy more of the depressed basers again soon, and even get more takeovers.... 3) kinda shame on Louis Navallier who actually recently headline-grabbed, with, "is Cisco the next Enron ?" oy.

e) more general, political, misreported items proving why one should probably ignore 95 % of everything else out there:
1) I mentioned 'initial claims for unemployment' falling last time, from 441 K to 384 K, here....well, adjusted for 'seaonailty' (re-read my booklet !), turns out they actually ROSE, and from 636 K to 760 K ! not only different direction, but also way bigger numbers....are U still trying to employ govt. figures as DAFPP factors ? why ? ....2) also, unexpected/unpredicted by anyone out there, including me, evidently, the Enron craziness created very high trading transactions and volume on many stock and commodities and exchanges in Dec., actually helping many entities surrounding this industry, actually making many companies money....see ? there are always two sides to every coin, as I have taiught forever.... 3) and, only after more debacles than I can recount here, decades too late, now, Govt. and Corp. Amer. is mulling changes/% limits in the "amounts within its own pension plans, that company can/will allow their employees to invest (sic) in their own companies' stock".....as with most all such laws, this is B.S. and unnecessary.....all the millions of employees have to know, is my "PSYCLE sm" - and additionally valuable pattern recognition common sense, stops, diversification, no emotion, perspective, IG rotation - hey, that's my "PSYCLE sm"....

4) Arthur Andersen tried to defend its' (many say) immoral and unethical conflict-of-interest (but not admitted) behavior with ENE (and likely, tons of other controlled comapnies, but I digress), that, "the amt. ENE paid us was just a tiny fraction of their, and our, revenues", proves more of my "PSYCLE sm" tenets....next.... 5) this proves my thoughts even more: recent LAT article on ENE, mentioned that, unbelieveably, some stock certificates for ENE stock, readily available, and near worthless, have actually been ssold/bought on EBAY, for hundreds of times their current value ! (gosh, why not just buy one share down here for next to nothing ?) just shows the ignorance and stupidity among sectors of our great land, especially where financial/investing stuff is concenred....I again rest my case.... 6) while I still think he's not as terrible as he could be, which is something of a slight positive for a politician, I am losing some faith in Pres. Bush, because his recent tomes have bee talking out of both sides of issues, his rhetoric is saying juxtapositional things "we should be doing for our people", that are incompatable with "what corporations should be getting" from govt. - can't be done, his rhetoric Tues. in speech involved mutually exclusive items....I helped teach great economics at a major univ., and was an expert at one time, and, believe me, when one of the 3 parties involve win, others lose, and vice-versa....so he is, in actuality, an energy-stated guy, who expounds nothing but normal 'words' for a person in his station....nothing new, not much special...I am losing interest in his words already....next.... 7) and trying to even listen to Rumsfeld and Cheney were, as I mentioned early on, herein, has always been just impossible....yuck....

So, as you have seen, for years now, how well one does, often, just "doing" the best 'individual' stocks, and rotating Ind. Groups, chart-technically, and sentiment-wise, mostly long-side, while ignoring, or going contrary to, 95 % of all Media messages, and "indexes/averages" comments, from the peanut gallery ? By just getting my output, alone, you do much better, and save time, by not having to even try to "seek, and process" tons of other, useless fundamental info., anyway....and we also help remove potential emotional problems for you, before they begin....

3) Most recent Hypothetical "PSYCLE sm" transactions, to be mimicked, and referred back to:

Always remember to view "1-year-at-least past" charts of everything you can view, herein, along with their 200 day moving averages (DMA's), to "see/learn" the "PSYCLE patterns", and see where/when stocks in section (3) were Hypothetically bought near lows, and put near highs....all % percentage 'Gains' are just logical ESTIMATES for L.T., ITM options, where exist, and/or on Margin, where no options exist....