1) "PSYCLE SENSE sm": new:

Accepting a small number of pretty-insignificant QSL's along the way, as always, I am so proud of my output lately, and since way back on 9/21, my giving out just tons of mostly easily exploited mostly longside Gainers for you....Why, given my T.R. since 9/21 forward, some of my followers would actually choose not to ever buy any of my depressed Tech. or other ideas since, is beyond me....and beyond logic....as I was first/only to recently intimate, there are now still TONS of depr. tech., comp., biotech, utils, blue-chips, and other stocks forming potential triple, double, and/or intermediate-term H & S bottoms, some where 'the 95 %' are awating full retracements to 9/21 levels, which, as you have hopefully learned from me, historically, are therefore unlikely to occur that way....

While, as I also intimated, to seemingly deaf ears from my followers lately, as my longside list has been growing, the Daily Graphs 10-day A/D Oscillator, has now, I think, formed a quadruple-bottom at last week's lows ? and people are still not in enuf depr. Techs. from my list....got me....Plus, many individual stock's OBV's have bee rising, almost continually, from last Nov. '01 ....and, while I normally eschew most fundamentals, my 'tech. ind. headhunter contact person' tells me, she has been seeing up-blips, and demand-interest from potential employers, sort of a pent-up desire to start growing business again, which cannot hurt our case....

and, as often happens at "PSYCLE stages" like now, I wonder if, as usual, the 'economy', from a time down the road, will turn out to have done better than 'the people who were too scared to buy after 9/21' have been thinking....leading to a further upside resolution, as, as I mentioned way back, similar to after the 1987 crash ? well, i really hope for the best for all, but that element really does not matter, since, i usually predict 2/3 of longside correct prices anyway, regardless/independent, of any external items surrounding markets, yes ? Just do what we do herein, and, as usual, one will do very well indeed over time....glad to be of such continual help.... the pattern remain employable....nice....

and/but, as always, please do not ignore my Puttables list, regardless....enuf of them will probably work out anyway, as usual, and remain exploitable from here, as usual....

and, when you read next section (2) today, (a), note the clear, several IGR signals occuring all of a sudden around here....another in a long line of valuable pattern-learning opportunities for y'all, from one of the best....

always try to also VIEW charts of the ones we 'just miss' to learn the patterns even further, as they were also given herein specifically as well, yes ? more proof of "PSYCLE sm" power/value....

2) "What's Been Said, and What I've Read":

a) Important Industry Group (Rotation) notes:
1) as I intimated, in again-near-perfect "PSYCLE sm" nuance, I finally got a 'gotta buy long commodity options on Gold" phone call, Fri., at $ 308 cash Gold, dig ? worse, it was from a Yoga buddy, with no knowledge of track record....so you know what to expect in Golds from here, soon, yes ? and, already, Mon., most are pulling back, as usual, right ? are you learning the pattern ? oh, and, the majors now show potential triple-tops, see them ? have I been among the best ever at timiong Golds, for years back now, or what ? you're welcome ....2) kudos to me, yet again, for, as usual, being the first/only to catch another spate of depr. Techs., and Biotech, stocks very recently, right near lows....you're welcome....and one can still very much buy, most any previously-loved-when-over $ 100 stock-in -2000-or-1999 -when-they-were- big-name-sexy-stocks-(which I was among the first few to suggest selling/shorting after parabolic rises)-but-now-been-under-$ 9. Tech/Internet stocks, near recent lows, with stops, diversified....historically bigger % gains potentials from single-digit stock prices, yes ? ....3) ditto with the Utilities, which, for years nbow, have provided my followers with usually-easily-obtainable, L.T., ITM calls options (and occasionally Puts) Gains, yet few people ever take EZ advantage....why ? I guess the same reasons they don't buy the depr. Techs, etc., right ? Hey, I exist, to help these nice people, when and if....

4) as I also intimated, although we got a few fits and starts, the Energy Service I.G. is on goal-line, but may shape up higher after all.... 5) and, obviously, as usual, I am the first/only to have added some depr. China/Asian stocks, buyable.... 6) and, still, all I hear, with supposedly-high-yielding-issues (dgms), from B-firms (dgms), is, "we think high yields of 3 and 4 and 5 % are obtainable with such-and-such stock", which, as any scentient person knows, is total toe-jam, given historical facts....to struggle just to 'get' 'only' such low yields, while putting one's money at risk in iussues of little volatility or attractiveness, is ridiculous....yet millions do just that....got me....just proves my "PSYCLE sm' tenets yet again, and our approaches' value.... 5) while I was the first/only to give depr. Insur. stocks herein as Longs, from lows, for you, i also recommended taking nice Puts Gains in some Insurance stocks Puts, some which have been showing more relative strength lately, which proves my I.G. rotation Booklet concepts, learn the signals....

b) more, misleading, sensationalized, Late, and/or improper/incorrect comments from the Financial Media, Reporters, etc.:
1) the ignorant CNBC-ers continue to puzzlingly overreport stuff on WHR, a non-volatile, non-important stock/company if there ever was one, so mature in its I.G., etc. - why ? I dunno, maybe someone is paying them ?, or maybe theyare still so unenlightened they cannot find the tons of mostly-successful stocks/pattern/groups I do, which might actually help millions of people....what a waste of air time.... 2) well, Tom (dgms) Petruno, L.A.T., recent article, is late/high/useles yet again, as his latest front-poage column, "Simple, easy-to-understand, consumer firms stocks are back in vogue", suggests, not buying depressed Techs nor Biotechs, but, instead, already-up-and-extended, 'basic' stocks, like, HRB, AZO, WGO, KKD, MIKE, RYL, YUM, WFMI, IHOP, HDI, (where was he at their lows ? oh, yeah, looking somewhere else as usual)....this is more proof of my "PSYCLE sm" at work, yes ? and, his intimation is itself criticizing, and a bit insulting, to investors, yes ? ....3) and recent front-page 1/27 article, L.A.T., "for fund mgrs., it's a new bull market in skepticism....investors rethink strategy", which, as you know, sentiment-wise, is probably another potentially bullish item, l.T., yes ? P.S., investors will NEVER 'rethink' anything properly nor in a timely manner, BEFORE any I.G.R. shifts, right ? they never have in the past, why would they start now ? 'nuff said....

c) more incorrect/misleading/sensationalized, and/or improper comments, from Fundamentalists/Companies, newspapers/magazines, etc., vs. illogical/Contrary/Unlinkable, past/present/future Economic items, and/or stock price moves:
1) something is still definitely wrong here, as WCOM announced bad results, partially "due to a glut in the braodband market", yet, I, and thousands of others using stock-market software, cannot get a guranateed, smooth, 100 % contstant-datastream flow (as guraranteed by them) from ATT Broadband cp., my cable modem co. local monopoly.... interesting, huh. ? .... 2) continuing unenlightened Multex, now repoorts super-negatively-connectedly on Tech. stocks, citing, "mounting hysteria about Enron woes spreading to Tech. companies/stocks"....but you and i know different, timing/choosing wise, yes ?, so we look to Buy the ones I like....neat.... 3) the idiots all over the Financial Media, who certainly should know better, have kept referring to Enron as, "one of the largest corporations in America", which, as usual, proves my "PSYCLE sm", and that 'the 95 %' are truly lazy and/or ignorant about many things easily learned, investing/timing/trading-wise, yes ?

d) more, likely late, incorrect, and/or misleading, comments, from Brokerage firms, NL writers, Analysts, economists, Money Managers, etc.:
1) as sometimes happens near bottoms, Value Line listed a plethora of 'stock-like-I-would-normally-like' as "stock with the highest potential annual returns the next 5 years" in their most recent missive....as i intimated a while ago herein, when V.L. and I both agree on something, that helps as welll, dig ? their list is too long for here, but just know, this is a bullish development, L.T., probably.... 2) in a real shoicker (why is he really doing this ?), Louis Navallier, a guy I have respected at times, is suggesting, "is CSCO (with its $ 19 B. in cash and no debt ?) the next Enron ?" , to which I would say, uh, no....why even do that ? very disappointing....

3) shockingly, B. Schaeffer (dgms) cited, "no one on wall st. of the mdia are reporting the gold prise rise, so we are bullish", yet, I hear/read/observe the exact opposite, big-time, yes ? gosh, I wonder what he has been not seeing here.....yet he is way famous and followed....weird, huh....since i have been way better than his guys all over the place, and with Golds, whom do you think will turn out to be correct with this one ? ....4) rare kudos also to MER, who actually gets one right, a little later than me, but probably vorrect, in suggesting that HDI's days of high growth may be ending, and their stock may be topping....and, hmmmmm, who was the first/only to give out HDI. herein as Put, recently, right at S.T. top ? they should be poaying ME for VG advice, ay ?

e) more general, political, misreported items proving why one should probably ignore 95 % of everything else out there:
1) interesting, as per recent L.A.T., article on U.S. charities, said, evidently, in Y2K (which is now over 2 years ago, hmmmmm, no figures yet for 2001, but I digress), Americans contributed $ 204. Billion to charities, yay....this was a 6.6 % invcrease over 1999....and represented over 2 % of our domestic GDP....take that, negative people who stupidly assume we are now giving anything back....I wonder what % other countries have been doing so....

So, as you have seen, for years now, how well one does, often, just "doing" the best 'individual' stocks, and rotating Ind. Groups, chart-technically, and sentiment-wise, mostly long-side, while ignoring, or going contrary to, 95 % of all Media messages, and "indexes/averages" comments, from the peanut gallery ? By just getting my output, alone, you do much better, and save time, by not having to even try to "seek, and process" tons of other, useless fundamental info., anyway....and we also help remove potential emotional problems for you, before they begin....

3) Most recent Hypothetical "PSYCLE sm" transactions, to be mimicked, and referred back to:

Always remember to view "1-year-at-least past" charts of everything you can view, herein, along with their 200 day moving averages (DMA's), to "see/learn" the "PSYCLE patterns", and see where/when stocks in section (3) were Hypothetically bought near lows, and put near highs....all % percentage 'Gains' are just logical ESTIMATES for L.T., ITM options, where exist, and/or on Margin, where no options exist....