1) "PSYCLE SENSE sm": new:

Still more longside Gains being created for you, almost a steady stream, ay ? you're welcome....plenty remain buyable, as well as puttables exploitable, yet, even with the great T.R. herein again recently, I am unable to get my deserving people to take advantage....i will keep putting out mostly excellent stuff, in the hopes of helping them all even more....

hey, the CBOE's P/C ratio was a pretty-high 0.82, after Mon. 11th close, certainly more bullish than not, ay ? and people are still not in my depr. Techs, Biotechs, Utils, etc., amazing....plus, recall when I mentioned even B. Schaeffer's 10d-20d MA of his P/C Osc. was 'getting much closer' to potential buyable areas whih marked the last few intermediate-term market bottoms ?, well, according to him (but, amzingly, he remains real bearish, weird, huh, and has missed tons of longside gains YOU have received herein), we are there....neat.... I would not ignore this potential signal area....

meanwhile, seeing a bunch of our basers popping, see sec. (4) after pb's, a decent sign, but others are pulling back....and, getting some QSL's among Puttables, of little consequence, since that normally means better longside performance, so you have BEEN buying more Longs, still, yes ? if not, why not ? but, that said, seeing very rare action among several puttables, where they seem to be trying to breakout above rolling top patterns, above very-recent tops, but tying or just slightly approaching their Dec. 01 tops, oy, making those stocks Very difficult to play, so we'll put more (?) notations among them herein, and step aside in non-clear-patterned ones....so, a little miffy overall again, but one should remain aggresive and more fully invested, a posture proven over and over to be a VG way to be, herein, the last years, yes ?

always try to also VIEW charts of the ones we 'just miss' to learn the patterns even further, as they were also given herein specifically as well, yes ? more proof of "PSYCLE sm" power/value....

2) "What's Been Said, and What I've Read":

a) Important Industry Group (Rotation) notes:
1) boy, were we perfect again on the depr. Biotechs again recently, or what....you're welcome....if you were not in these, why not ? ....2) I am/was certainly, as usual, the first/only to give some depr. auto/parts stocks herein as buys from lows....again, if you are not it, why not ? ....3) ditto some Utilities, with their cheap L.T., ITM calls where suitable, EZ....if you are not in THOSE also, why not ? ....4) and, ditto with the blue-chip depr. Insurance stocks you got at llows, neat....if not you did not get in them, why not ? ....5) and I usually don't do this, but similarly to recent MDR pop, RFMD had a ton of puts bt. recently around $ 18+, could be bullish, forward, and is in correct I.G. here ? ....6) and UTHR received an 'approvable letter' for its drug, and it traded 3 mm shs. after I added it again at recent lows....you're welcome.... 7) and a big SMith, barney analyst confirmed that "many individual investors began to buy Gold stocks recently" - and you know what that means, "PSYCLE-wise", yes ? the pattern rarely changes....

7) interesting, how a few depr. REIT's are appearing on my list, even as I.R.'s bottom, and much commercial R.E. fades a bit nationwide.... 8) and, note, i am again, the first/only to re-add some 'potential stage 2' Coal-type stocks long....recall, as usual, i liked them 2-3-years ago first, then, after missing parabolic rises, wall st. began to love them, yes ? at their tops, when i reported that as being probable toppy herein, yes ?, and, then, only after being wrong again as usual, after big subsequent drops, wall st. dislikes them again - so, of course, I re-add some for you....learning the pattern ? if not, why not ? ....8) our possibly puttable extended Retail-tyoe stocks, are right on the goal-line, some are trying to breakout, others possibly 'fobo's', others still puttable with close stops anyway....

b) more, misleading, sensationalized, Late, and/or improper/incorrect comments from the Financial Media, Reporters, etc.:
1) late/high and missing it a long while ago as usual, CNBC's Joe Kernan (where has HE been ?) finally highlighted the 'reinssurance' stopcks, some which I had successfully, then unsuccessfully, as Puttables in recent past months....aside from their recent strength, one has to wonder, again, why NO one on CNBC, or ayother B-firm analyst, appeared, after 9/11/01, citing, as JK put it, "the reason they are at highs, is, unfortunately, because of that one-time disasterous event"....hmmmm....if it was so 'obvious/built-in', then how come EVERYONE out there missed it ? so, more proof of my concepts.... 2) in a nicely correct (but rare) damning article, 2/1 L.A.T., "at the new chatty CNN< less news is good news", proves my "PSYCLE sm" tenets about/against most Media stuff, yet again....semi-kudos for the Times for printing this long-but-should-already-have-neen-known subject matter....namely, that 'news' media sources are more-and-more 'entertainment' and/or waste of time, and/or with too-often negative, scare-creating/overcovering of non-important items, 'emotionalizing or sensationalizing', etc., places/outputs....I have chrinicled countless examples herein over the years, of 'what they do'....dgms....most all artifical, what a shame....

3) and we have yet another 'CNBC gal reporter with a speech impediemtn', weird, how they hire such people....my associates also noticed this, but we wish her well....uh, Sharon _____ is also a 'minority', 'nuff said....no hiring pressure on the part of CNBC there, ay ? she also talks so over-fast (dgms), one cannot really glean much of useable value from her well-meaning output....oy....no help.... 4) and, similarly, recent L.A.T. article, "TV trying to find Enron tale's sexy side", is also damning....latching onto emotional side of ruined, ignorant-about-investing, but nice people undeserving of such terrible losses, employees....'nuff said.... 5) Fri., J. Kernan actually misreported NUE stock negatively, saying, "it sold off recently, trying to buy BIR steel....we kid analysts a lot here, but some are all right...." gee, cannot he see how strong NUE has been in a rough market ? exactly the opposite of his incorrect-as-usual slant....thank goodness, i have seen less of him in recent months on CNBC....but perhaps I am hoping for too much, ay ?

c) more incorrect/misleading/sensationalized, and/or improper comments, from Fundamentalists/Companies, newspapers/magazines, etc., vs. illogical/Contrary/Unlinkable, past/present/future Economic items, and/or stock price moves:
1) still more proof that 'big institutions' are not automatically right any more than us plebians, as recent Value Line, chronicled that, late Dec./early Jan., big dudes BOUGHT, tons more AWE, PCS, CD, after, of course, having bought/held them all the way down, dig ? the pattern rarely changes....and they fell further....oh, and they sold CBE, HCA, EMC, FRE, SWY, right near S.T. lows....uh, huh....they will never change, right ? ....2) one of the questioners of Enron crooks, in testimony Thu., actually said, incorrectly, historically, "our economy is the strongest in the history of the world", which shows, even the 'good guys' are not as sharp/knowledgeable as they should/could be, yes ?

d) more, likely late, incorrect, and/or misleading, comments, from Brokerage firms, NL writers, Analysts, economists, Money Managers, etc.:
1) the so-far-not-so-good-T.R. Changewave's Tobin Smith, Mon. 11th, came out again with super-bearish warning, citing, "Enronitis spreads....NASDAQ 1,400 next....a violent retest of 1,400 is quite possible if CSCO, VRSN, GE, JDSU, BRCM, MSFT, become toxic waste due to radioactive accounting trubles...." geez, is this guy on something ? wish we are told his way-past T.R., because he fails to backup much he says, and I have been beating him all along herein, ay ? ....2) semi-kudos also to Prudential, which, Tue., suggested MHP may be like HDI. last NL here, in slower future growth, and overpriced stock....i agree(d) with both ones.... 3) while most all I say abut Value Line has been and continues to be historically true, semi-kudos to their "highlighted stocks" T.R., starting back from 12/00, which, published recently, shows a bunch did indeed well-outperfom the indexes....of course, they rarely 'sell' anything, nor have they had a good sale/stop strategy in 35 years, dgms ....their 'other selections favored' list, had a bunch of BIG losses, with no stops....I rest my case, nevertheless....

3) more B.S. from Mr. B.S., as Tue., article, "volatility indexes imply market move coming" - but, specifics and prediction from them ? "we cannot infer in which direction the market will move"....uh, thanks for nothing again, guys.... next.... 4) and, recent Value LIne front-page, chronicling their own 'top-rated # 1 picks" timing history for 2001, and, yup, they admitted, they UNDER-performed indexes, and most all averages, like, their 'group 1 stocks for highest timliness', even allowing for changes in rank, down -20.3 % for 2001....next.... 4) Value Line's recent highlight super-buy, is Ikon, a stock which, a few years ago, i had a client in under $ 5, V.L. hated it, then rose to $ 15, they added it, I panned it, they hated it again late 2000, my client had it again under $ 5, and, now, V.L. adds it again at $ 14, see the pattern ? how many times do I have to prove my stuff, and unprove their stuff ? where is my national forum which can help millions of people ? the pattern rarely changes.....

5) and, Fri., another ignorant analyst commenting on recent weakness in NVDA stock (predicted only/first by me, as usual, not ever by them, as usual), shockingly saying, "even considering the possible accounting irregularities alleged by the SEC, it is still undervalued fundamentally and on a PE basis", which is stunning on a few levels, given the facts and historical comparisons, and it's extendedness, yes ? see the pattern ?

e) more general, political, misreported items proving why one should probably ignore 95 % of everything else out there:
1) a recent Acura commercial, which explains a lot about what is wrong with muchof our society, proclaims, "for people who think that getting there is more important than where they are going"....very non-yogic.... 2) told you so: evidently, as predicted, the revenues, business generated, interest nationally, etc., around the SLC olympics, is not what was planned/expected....next.... 3) according to a recent big L.A.T. article, regardless of ones beliefs, even Bush's propsed higher military spending desires will leave the USA at a slightly LOWER level than after the 1946 WW2 war, 1953 Korea, 1968 Vietnam peak, and 1987 reagan peak-buildup, periods, in our defense spending, in constant 'adjusted' back to then dollars.... 4) recent big article, L.A.T., on how, in their even-recent studies, "despite recession, big (top) corp. execs continue to receive huge perks, as small investors struggle....hidden benefits mushroom as employees' retirement plans shrink", is, of course, nothing new to us....as i have taiught for decades, things rarely change....'nuff said.... 5) please don't hate me, but I have been hearing way too many 'bible and religion references' by several questioners in the Enron hearings....truthfully, they should all acknowledge, that 'religion' has often been the cause, or at least, a crutch, used by tons of previous crooks to do what they did, 'in the name of it', and/or as a hammer when they try to hurt others, yes ? yo, just get the job done, folks, and leave anything extraneous or preachy, out of it....

6) and, that the craziness happened in judging the Olympics skating flak, just proves my "PSYCLE sm" tenet, that things raraley, ever, change, with human behavior and patterns, yes ?

So, as you have seen, for years now, how well one does, often, just "doing" the best 'individual' stocks, and rotating Ind. Groups, chart-technically, and sentiment-wise, mostly long-side, while ignoring, or going contrary to, 95 % of all Media messages, and "indexes/averages" comments, from the peanut gallery ? By just getting my output, alone, you do much better, and save time, by not having to even try to "seek, and process" tons of other, useless fundamental info., anyway....and we also help remove potential emotional problems for you, before they begin....

3) Most recent Hypothetical "PSYCLE sm" transactions, to be mimicked, and referred back to:

Always remember to view "1-year-at-least past" charts of everything you can view, herein, along with their 200 day moving averages (DMA's), to "see/learn" the "PSYCLE patterns", and see where/when stocks in section (3) were Hypothetically bought near lows, and put near highs....all % percentage 'Gains' are just logical ESTIMATES for L.T., ITM options, where exist, and/or on Margin, where no options exist....