1) "PSYCLE SENSE sm": new:

My newest chartbooks showed some more V.S.T. tops more, so I added more S.T.-puttables, in sec. (7) below, for the opneing Tuesday....yet, puzzlingly, again, few of my people are in individual puts on my stocks, or even indexes....but, still, I view TONS of 'higher OBV's for months now' among stocks, techs, and non-techs, so any decline, especially in most of our depresseds, from here, should be short-lived, as I first began mentioning in our 'split' market, a little while ago for you, and, of course, we gave given out a plethora of mostly-gains, longside AND put-side, till super-recently....but many Puttables buyable here still, yes ?

But/and, as i mentioned also, the 'buys after pb's here' are gonna be real decent, like after 1987 perhaps ? (but dont think about that now, just do everything, herein, and later, as well), so I am hoping that my people who keep not buying near lows, will take advantage this next cooming time....and, meanwhile, will make even more money in Puttables until then....neat....I am glad to be of such valuable help....

always try to also VIEW charts of the ones we 'just miss' to learn the patterns even further, as they were also given herein specifically as well, yes ? more proof of "PSYCLE sm" power/value....

2) "What's Been Said, and What I've Read":

a) Important Industry Group (Rotation) notes:
1) unbelieveably, very recent Multex recommendation says, "even though already down a ton (which, BTW, they did NOT predict, of course, but, of course, never mentioned, dgms), ORCT, STTE, WCG, in 'DSL" I.G., can now be sold short here"....gee, only beginning to short after huge drops, ay ?, vs. shorting extended stocks near their tops ? i dont think you are providing much of a service nor educational value, ay ? oh, yeah, you guys have not 'put' a stock since you started sending me your NL, for months and months....amazing....next.... 2) noticed blurb in L.A.T. finally, highlighting 'cash cocoa futures', up from hwre I seemed to be among the forst few to have suggested bottom, late Y2K, herein, recall....had fallen from L.T. resistance around 1650. (where I was on KWHY-tv in Fall 1997 calling that probable top, recall), to 750., late Y2K, and, so far, up towards the 1500. level again - and as the "PSYCLE sm" usual pattern, only now does it get mentioned positively....the pattern rarely changes....but 'the 95%' will never learn, but you are, yes ?

3) note some double-mentioned, and newly-added Puttable I.G.'s in sec. (7) below....gotta mean something, S.T. anyway....and some indexes as well....and some people are still not in individual stocks puts nor index puts, amazing, huh..... 4) and looking back, it is again stunning, that not one of my "gold-desiring' clients or followers, held any Gold stocks, into recent run-up....unnecessarily, given previous bases and "PSYCLE sm" tenets, even given our '1/2-pos sales' at top of recent base range....hopefully, but not likely for most unfortunately, given historical behavior patterns, few will take advantage the next time around, nor, now that I think of it, probably Puts Gains possible S.T. from highs here ahead soon ? hmmmmm....once again, I will be the first/only to Put them herein, yes ? will my followers do so ? if not, why not ? ....5) and we got yet another takeover, as CIEN offers $ 6 1/4 for our ONIS, up from around $ 4. quickly, you're welcome....I expect more mergers among depr. techs, telecoms, biotechs, etc., will you take advantage ? if not, why not ?

b) more, misleading, sensationalized, Late, and/or improper/incorrect comments from the Financial Media, Reporters, etc.:
1) recent L.A.T. headline, "Bloomberg's latest financial news: more 'pain' for N.Y.C.", cites their current record ($ 4.8 B.) N.Y. city budget deficit, unfortunately....lots of cutbacks, etc., coming, while Calif.'s state budget deficit is supposedly ($ 25. B.), ditto, of course....they are cutting, believe it or not, fire, police, and, of course, education, which seemingly NO state ever values as highly as defense or corruption, right ? (dgms)....raising taxes on stuff in NYC, 100,000 job cuts, and deferring lots of pension stuff for city employees, noting that in 2001 alone, "wall st. lost 25,000 jobs itself' ....and NYC lost $ 800 mm in tax base in 2001....brokerage firm profits droped in 2001, from $ 25 B. to $ 8 B.", so, the recognitions, likely, is the beginning of the end of the drop for them, yes ?

2) you have yet another popp. to meld a neg. Media story, with a probable saucer bottom, as last week, FLE was reported in L.A.T., as 'mgmt. turmoil, rough business future', etc., dig ? 'nuff said....and, maybe ditto on a pb, for PHSY, ahead, yes ? ....3) CNBC continues to overreport and try to sensationalize (re-read my Media Booklet) IBM's stock price moves, as if it is volatile, which it is not....gosh, the Finl. Media sucks, most of the time....

c) more incorrect/misleading/sensationalized, and/or improper comments, from Fundamentalists/Companies, newspapers/magazines, etc., vs. illogical/Contrary/Unlinkable, past/present/future Economic items, and/or stock price moves:
1) we eschew 95 5 of al real orperceived fundamentals, but I did recently read L.A.T. article, on how the WTO and the U.S. are pushing for Mexico to open up their monopoly on wireless (TMX, just FYI), which, THEY said, if was to come true, might help companies like Avantel, owned by WCOM, and Alestra, woned by ATT.... 2) I saw a VG show on CNBC, Mon., chronicling 'the history of wall st.', and, even during the civil war, they noted that, "the people at the exchange floor actually knew about the end of the war, before Pres. Lincoln did", so even early on, it was most always more important to watch the STOCK's pattern, more than any 'fundamental' items, dig ? more proof of my "PSYCLE sm"....neat....learn the patterns....

3) recent front-page L.A.T. headline, "Closing the books on dot-coms, memoirs, dot-com journals, fallen upstart geniuses writing books to distance themmselves from huge losses", proves my "PSYCLE sm" yet again....when I got death-threats and career-destroying responses by being, as usual, controversially among the very first few to predict the immminent demise of the parabolic internet stocks, etc., while on KWHY-tv and elsewhere, in 1999 and 2000, I explained that, after, it would prove, as quoted in this artricle, "the cluelessness of the people who create dthis whole mess in the first place....instead of ehlping people worldwide, they tried to glamorize themselves as products on people....it turned out to be a gold rush, not a gold mine...." (hope this makes sense to you)....of interest, another quote, "but it eventually ceased being about gross revenue....then, they wanted gross profit margins, controlling losses...." Well, duh....which says it all, I guess, huh....another said, 'we all got screwed, believing the hype....it was a job for people who otherwise would have been jobless...." I now predict some TV/movies, don't you ? the worse thing, of course, as always, is - you guessed it - they will likely never learn good, future-prdiction nor helpful-to-millions of people things, when the next parabolic item is temporarily created, dig ? the pattern rarely changes....'nuff said....

d) more, likely late, incorrect, and/or misleading, comments, from Brokerage firms, NL writers, Analysts, economists, Money Managers, etc.:
1) rare kudos to Vanguard bond Funds guy, in recent missive, "big Gains are wrong reason to buy Bonds now", correctly pointed out that rates are low, historically, and, 'investors who chase pastperformance could be in tfor a rude awakening"....i agree, of course....also, another Yoga center age 55 guy told me he expected rates to fall and/or stay down for the foreseeable future, and you know what that likely means....'nuff said.... 2) and another Multex guy, Roger Maltbie, whose '18-yr.-experience-at-brokerage-firms' T.R. we are not told, of course, only now, likes, PCTY, NTBK, FDP (where was he at lows ? dgms), saying, amazingly, "the Russell 2000 looks exceptional here as a new buy, very good RS", when, in fact, it may be forming a L.T. double-top, already up + 25 5 from 9/01 lows....can't others find anything near lows, as i do so often and so relatively easily ? re-read my booklets....

3) B. Schaeffer put out a new 'SOIR over 1.00' list, so therefore potentially bullish longs, Fri., like these: ANN, ASO, S, BC, DHI, LIZ, RJR, RYL, ZMH, none of which is even remotely on mine, as all are right near their highs (might he be another stock guy ?)....he reminds us he remains bearish, otherwise (which puzzles me still, but I digress)....plus, viweing the dozens of stocks WITH an 'S.O.I.R.'s of over 2.0' (which should be even better, yes ?, I found some which are at least depresssed, dig ? once again, I expect to outperfom him vastly, we shall see....here are some of mine, that way: ABGX, DYN, FLE, AW, CNX, OPWV, PPL, TRLY, CREE....Mind you, few of his are ON my actiual lists herein (only, ABRX, lower), but as an exercise and more proof of my "PSYCLE's" superiority and value vs. most all other approaches....let's see whose list does better, forward, again....

4) CNBC interviewed Cybertrade (dgms) analyst Ken _______, Tue. 9:33, whose L.T. past T.R. we are not told (dgms), who loves Home-related stocks up here (where was he at lows ?), as incorrectly saying, "half the key to Gains, is only buying after a L.T. uptrend"....oh, yeah ?, in late stage 3 ? uh, where is your historical proof, guy ? geez.....

e) more general, political, misreported items proving why one should probably ignore 95 % of everything else out there:
1) once again, i was among the first few to be correct, as my "PSYCLE sm' applies to most other life endeavors, as, recent L.A.T. headline, AIDS cases fall to a 15-year low", proves my concept even further....'only' 4,227 new reported cases in Calif. in 2001, down from 18,964 new cases in 1993 (dgms), out of well over 30,000,000 people then and now....caes actually really droped since 1998, and, even HIV reported cases in 1998 were 'only' 40,000 in 1998.... even new reported cases of HIV in S.F. (!) were 'only' 1,122 in 2001, with alnmost all among same-sex men....As you know, while I have no political agenda nor judge nothing emotionally where possible herein, again we see how NO trend lasts at the same rate of growth forever....and, once covered extensively by the fear-greed-media, normally mark the top....the pattern rarely changes....and, often, you hear about the runs here first, yes ? countless examples in many life areas.....'nuff said....

6) and, that the craziness happened in judging the Olympics skating flak, just proves my "PSYCLE sm" tenet, that things rarely, ever, change, with human behavior and patterns, yes ? ....7) and, as i was among the first to suggest (as usual), front-page recent l.A.T. headline, "For Many, Olympic 'boon' is a Bust, economically", as many merchants, businesses, etc., have NOT seen tons of revenue from the event....part of reason, of course, is that evidently, locals stay home, and visitors are whisked from venues and over-security crap is hurting....dgms.... 7) more Enron crap, as, Tue., 9:38, WSJ reporter said, "Enron used special tax-benefits IN WHICH CONGRESS WAS COMPLICIT IN (my highlights), to avoid paying taxes unusually", yikes....next....

So, as you have seen, for years now, how well one does, often, just "doing" the best 'individual' stocks, and rotating Ind. Groups, chart-technically, and sentiment-wise, mostly long-side, while ignoring, or going contrary to, 95 % of all Media messages, and "indexes/averages" comments, from the peanut gallery ? By just getting my output, alone, you do much better, and save time, by not having to even try to "seek, and process" tons of other, useless fundamental info., anyway....and we also help remove potential emotional problems for you, before they begin....

3) Most recent Hypothetical "PSYCLE sm" transactions, to be mimicked, and referred back to:

Always remember to view "1-year-at-least past" charts of everything you can view, herein, along with their 200 day moving averages (DMA's), to "see/learn" the "PSYCLE patterns", and see where/when stocks in section (3) were Hypothetically bought near lows, and put near highs....all % percentage 'Gains' are just logical ESTIMATES for L.T., ITM options, where exist, and/or on Margin, where no options exist....