1) "PSYCLE SENSE sm": new:

Well, encouraging, generally....look at the section (4) Gainers I already gave you recently....and this rally may just be beginning....I gave out Puts Gainers, cut most all longside losses nicely, and continued to buy not-broken patterned issues, as seemingly everyone else out there got to the ledge of the cliff....just as in 1970, late 1974, 82, 84, 87, 90, 94, and mid-'98, we are here now at serviceable bottoms in many issues....and, anyone who isn't at least a little excited here, at the initial prospects longside, well, please study how most S.T. bottoms have formed the last several decades....because this one is the same....and, of course, re-read my booklets....

More good news: as I suggested recently, Fri. after the close, on Multex, Dick Arms (Index), said the '10-day A/D ovbt./ovsld. index' is at 1.49 - normally, historically, VERY good S.T. bottoms have lead to oversold rallies whenever that index is around 1.50 or more, dig ? The last 2 times, were 10/97 and 10/87, hmmmmm....of interest, some of the stocks he has a bullish (semis/teachs) and bearish (apparel/retail) bent on, are similar to mine....yay....keep in mind, as you have learned here, the 'easy money' often happens upside before anyone out there knows it happened on bottoms like ours here....I am also seeing a plethora of normal, usual EVB's here....take your pick, but do buy a bunch, with stops....

as to the pb's Monday, good....so more people will not buy near the lows, and many Techs especially will likely not make new lows...it doesnt often get much better than this for buying these....not a bull out there (except people like me)....of course, the non-bulls dwn here also never bought any Puts earlier, right ? the small Puts list alone is another decent sign, as I said recently.... hope you catch some near-lows here, for at least some decent bounces....I am here to help you....

always try to also VIEW charts of the ones we 'just miss' to learn the patterns even further, as they were also given herein specifically as well, yes ? more proof of "PSYCLE sm" power/value....

2) "What's Been Said, and What I've Read":

a) Important Industry Group (Rotation) notes:
1) well, I did it again - the first/only to give out Semis near recent lows for ya...."But, Jim, their fundamentals are still looking lower" - gee, please re-read my booklets.... anyway, I now see a growing list of super-depressed Techs, according to S & P, actually estimating PROFITS in 2001 or 2002, and/or already profitable ! think about that....why people are not scooping them up is beyind me (but not really, as we understand the dynamic here, while 'the 95%' do not).... 2) and, noticing what has transpired recently, I was also certainly the first/only to have given out many extended Retail, Medical, Gaming, Textile, Comml. Svcs., Military, Chem., stocks, fell towards their 200 DMA's recently, see ? the pattern rarely changes....

3) Robin Mesch, a supposed Bonds expert gal whose past T.R., we are not told, on CNBC, Mon. 12:25, says 'the consolidation bottom is at 105++ at lowest", and is still pretty bullish on the Bond.... 4) and, as I am again, I gues, the first to suggest S.T. bottoms and bounces in many Aisan stocks - just as 'the 95 %' got super-bearish - as usual....

b) more, misleading, sensationalized, Late, and/or improper/incorrect comments from the Financial Media, Reporters, etc.:
1) ....

c) more incorrect/misleading/sensationalized, and/or improper comments, from Fundamentalists/Companies, newspapers/magazines, etc., vs. illogical/Contrary/Unlinkable, past/present/future economic items, and/or stock price moves:
1) interestingly, as I taught you a while ago, there were tons of Insider Sales among already-super-depressed Techs recently - which proves once again, insiders do NOT know any more than others at turning points.... 2) CNBC's D.Faber, Mon. 12:15, story about how many companies use accounting gimmicks (don't get me started, re-read my Booklwets), to mask/hide/mislead numbers, etc., on takeovers, goodwill, R & D, etc., as if knowing that the last several years migh thave affected anything - the parabolic rise of unprofitable stocks, and/or the decline of profitable, long-existing stocks - dig ? total BS, as you have been taught....

3) CNBC reported Tue. that "univ. of mich. consumer sentiment" reading for this month, came out higher than expected....might this dovetail with Deloss Smith's comments ?

d) more, likely late, incorrect, and/or misleading, comments, from Brokerage firms, NL writers, Analysts, economists, Money Managers, etc.:
1) more anti-kudos for yet another round of dumb B-firms who only now downgraded ABI, one they ALL loved at the top a while ago, on Friday.... 2) even as he kinda agrees with me, Dick Arms, like EVRYONE else out there, said we cannot have a sustained rally until more hopeful people get whacked even more, which is, as you know, ridiculous.... 3) Salomon's John Jason, one guy who kinda did foretell the Techs decline, last year, said, Mon., they had NOT bottomed yet, 'a watched pot never boils' - but, as I taught you, often, the few analysts who foretell a trend early, almost always fail to reverse well afand stay too long, yes ? So, we'll fade him, yes ?

4) similarly, amazingly, I just received a 'copy mailing' late, from the Bob Prechter EWT people, titled, "an urgent report - famous market manias and their aftermaths", showing those previous historical parabolas, and big drops thereafter....problem is, THEY are NOW super-bearish - yet they comveniently left OUT, recent drops in Techs/NASDAQ, and probablye at least S.T. bottoms here, dig ? Last, realize, for the umpteenth time, EWT was WRONG predicting huge drops from the early 1980's, then again, AFTER the 1987 crash, yes ? so, thanks again for nothing fellas, but scaring people to try to get subscriptions, AFTER the fact when they were wrong in the first place....I still respect their concept somewhat, but, geez....

e) more general items proving why one should probably ignore 95 % of everything else out there:
1) gee, it only took the useless idiot politicians in Calif. several months to agree to stick it to consumers to alleviate part of the Elec. problem by raising our rates ridiculously....hmmmm....who was the first to predict that herein ? ....2) Deloss Smith, on CNBC Tue. 7 am, pointed out, that, so far, even with the 200,000 layoffs in Techs here-around, "they are being abosrbed by other companies/areas of our economy, and unemployment is NOT rising much considering, which is actually a good sign"....

So, as you have seen, for years now, how well one does, often, just "doing" the best 'individual' stocks, and rotating Ind. Groups, chart-technically, and sentiment-wise, mostly long-side, while ignoring, or going contrary to, 95 % of all Media messages, and "indexes/averages" comments, from the peanut gallery ? By just getting my output, alone, you do much better, and save time, by not having to even try to "seek, and process" tons of other, useless fundamental info., anyway....and we also help remove potential emotional problems for you, before they begin....

3) Most recent Hypothetical "PSYCLE sm" transactions, to be mimicked, and referred back to:

Always remember to view "1-year-at-least past" charts of everything you can view, herein, along with their 200 day moving averages (DMA's), to "see/learn" the "PSYCLE patterns", and see where/when stocks in section (3) were Hypothetically bought near lows, and put near highs....all % percentage 'Gains' are just logical ESTIMATES for L.T., ITM options, where exist, and/or on Margin, where no options exist....