1) "PSYCLE SENSE sm": new:

Obviously, NASDAQ-wise, most longside bets were off, when that index broke below the 1800+ level, and I don't think I have a single person I am in contact with, who is buying much of anything, nor has, for a while....still holding good amounts of cash, have endured only minor additional damage, and all wish they had done more Puts with me, as usual....while the most recent breakdowns are disappointing, damage has been rathe low compared to all the stories I hear directly and indirectly from others, and, as usual, WE will likely be there first, and best, off eventual lows, longside....

So, one must continue to selectively buy depresseds still in patterns not yet broken down, and also take a shot at some huge names in potential EVB's, here and now.... diversifying, close stops, low risk, big potential when/if correct....it is that simple, here....and, last, do note, I continue to have given you many very successful Puts all along, though, as I said, that list shrinking....and, once again, while 'the 95% and the Media' may be 'waiting for some kind of capitulation' (as if that would ever show up in a generally disseminated manner (re-read my booklets), WE know the turn and fast big pops will occur 'from out of nowhere', and probably soon....and they will miss them, as usual....

and do notice the plethora of new section (6) pot. long buys all of a sudden I give you today....all have remained in patterns of bases or EVB's, so far, still....do it....and, except for a few rare clunkers, 'the 95%' are gonna be real upset they sold stuff down here, hence...oh, one last thing, for those who insist on trying to 'link' fundamental announcements to stock prices: realize, if every single Tech. stocks has already been 'lowering their eps guidance', and they are already down -66 % to -95 %, then many have GOT to be buys soon, yes ? at least for 'in-between reporting periods' bounces, right ?

and, just B4 this was put onto web, CNBC finally - get this - did a story on Rydex "short-side" M. funds - get it ? saying, "this is a great way to hedge or participate in declines...." very Late, again, as usual, dig ? take heed, and do the opposite !

always try to also VIEW charts of the ones we 'just miss' to learn the patterns even further, as they were also given herein specifically as well, yes ? more proof of "PSYCLE sm" power/value....

2) "What's Been Said, and What I've Read":

a) Important Industry Group (Rotation) notes:
1) first, I will again take credit for being the only/first to give out many Energy/Service stocks as Puts herein from recent tops for you, for S.T. drops....2) and, a client kudo'd me for being the first to, on KWHY-TV, predict the huge declines in Internet-type stocks from their parabolic tops late 1999 and early 2000, my saying that probably 2/3 of all such companies would not even exist 3-5- years hence from then....while a very small % of them ran higher first, most fell tremendously, therefrom, yes ? and, even those that rose a bit first, fell -90 % anyway, right ? and NONE of those holders from those middle-tops sold any before huge drops, anyway, as usual in the pattern, ay ? the sequential pattern rarely changes.... 3) and, interestingly, i was the first/only to (correctly-so-far give out some depressed-hated-feared Japan stocks herein, SNE, MBK, etc., fobd's ? ...and be sure not to miss some of the 'power stocks' i gave recently here near their lows....sometime betwen here and this summer, those are all likely to have pops, regardless, yes ? if only to sucker people in again, after their big % S.T. rises coming, dig ?

b) more, misleading, sensationalized, Late, and/or improper/incorrect comments from the Financial Media, Reporters, etc.:
1) I gotta say it....CNBC's M.C. Cabrera has develeoped a shockingly annoying speech impedement....while I would not say this about someone NOT overpaid to talk in the air, it is very upsetting to try to listen to her, so I don't - and millions of listeners get hurt - again.... 2) J. Kernan, CNBC, Tue., trying to sensationalize (re-read my booklets), vastly misleading, saying, "the Drug index is SOARING, up 3 points, to 634...." similarly, gal reporter misled, "the Gold stocks are up huge...." uh, NO, wrong....'nuff said.... 3) more CNBC bull, Wed., with a reporter asked, "but where is the real pain ? where is the gut-wrenching, end-of-the-world pain ? I don't see it from anyone I speak with/...." Which is, of course, total BS....it is all around....just proves again how ignorant those people in Media are....

c) more incorrect/misleading/sensationalized, and/or improper comments, from Fundamentalists/Companies, newspapers/magazines, etc., vs. illogical/Contrary/Unlinkable, past/present/future economic items, and/or stock price moves:
1) as the first/only to give out AZA at top as VG put herein for you, as per my Booklets, one should wonder why JNJ could not have easily bought out AZA near $ 20, or its base in 1999 nearer $ 11+, instead of paying over $ 40, dig ? ....

d) more, likely late, incorrect, and/or misleading, comments, from Brokerage firms, NL writers, Analysts, economists, Money Managers, etc.:
1) as expected, seeing more and more analysts just now beginning to come out with negative reports on all sorts of Tech. companies, in stage 7, as usual, ay ? thanks for nothing, fellas all.... 2) and TONS of wrong analysts finally lowered their opinions on ARBA, BVSN, CMRC, EPNY, DCTM, ENTU, INKT, today - amazing, huh....but I have been chronicling that behavior for months here, yes ?

e) more general items proving why one should probably ignore 95 % of everything else out there:
1)

So, as you have seen, for years now, how well one does, often, just "doing" the best 'individual' stocks, and rotating Ind. Groups, chart-technically, and sentiment-wise, mostly long-side, while ignoring, or going contrary to, 95 % of all Media messages, and "indexes/averages" comments, from the peanut gallery ? By just getting my output, alone, you do much better, and save time, by not having to even try to "seek, and process" tons of other, useless fundamental info., anyway....and we also help remove potential emotional problems for you, before they begin....

3) Most recent Hypothetical "PSYCLE sm" transactions, to be mimicked, and referred back to:

Always remember to view "1-year-at-least past" charts of everything you can view, herein, along with their 200 day moving averages (DMA's), to "see/learn" the "PSYCLE patterns", and see where/when stocks in section (3) were Hypothetically bought near lows, and put near highs....all % percentage 'Gains' are just logical ESTIMATES for L.T., ITM options, where exist, and/or on Margin, where no options exist....