1) "PSYCLE SENSE sm": new:

as I intimated last time here: see ? they got the majority all expecting disappointment and declines from obvious S.T. resistance levels (me included to a small extent, though, as you know, we rarely do 'indexes', and continue(d) to buy and do very well on the Longside regardless), and, Wed./Thu., got more pops up, among Longs and Puttables....

recall, my thoughts that, in normal "PSYCLE sm" sentiment, because 'the 95 %' were expecting A, the market did B instead....but the A/D line et al did look S.T. roll-over-y, and we wonder whether Wed./Thu. pops may end up being the sucker-in type, then down a bit anyway, then up higher after, dig ? just to upset the max. no. of people out there who are too-often late in anticipating the patterns....

of interest, evidently 'Investors Intelligence % bullish' just fell, real fast, from 61 % (too high) to 44 % (much better), already....and, evidently, the CBOE's Put/Call ratio already rose to 81 %, another sign to be less bearish and more bullish, in my depressed stocks, pullbacks accepted....a broken record from me since calling the April lows....

also, as I intimated last time here, surprising recent strength among some of our Puttables confirms why one must have had, and must still have, way more Longs here, regardless of any real or perceived, internal or external market 'stuff' ....that some Puts are QSL's this week, were, once again, way overbalanced to our favor, by the many more QLG's among our Longsiders, no damage overall, and portfolios still rising....

always try to also VIEW charts of the ones we 'just miss' to learn the patterns even further, as they were also given herein specifically as well, yes ? more proof of "PSYCLE sm" power/value....it also has made trading Puttables more difficult temporarily....

2) "What's Been Said, and What I've Read":

a) Important Industry Group (Rotation) notes:
1) surprised but pleased with new upside breakouts in more Gold stocks...our cheapie-laggards acting well as expected.... 2) they did it again....MSDW just went super-bullish on some already-up-a-lot-from-where-only-I-was-among-the-first-to-predict levels Semiconductor stocks.... 3) perhaps they will do it again: recent L.A.T. highlighted the "Bank" stocks index - at possible rolling tops, yes ? we shall see....so far, 1/2 and 1/2.... 4) watching Energy stocks, with puzzling pops again here, must weaken anew or else....

b) more, misleading, sensationalized, Late, and/or improper/incorrect comments from the Financial Media, Reporters, etc.:
1) in their latest wrong-right-at-the-bottom article, James Lowell, in "Investment Advisor" Mag. April issue, "Down but not out", hammered the Tech. stocks, just as I was giving properly as S.T. buys herein....of interest he wrote, "a dead cat - without the bounce....", and, "the dot.coms are dead -a nd rightly so....can this sector rebound ? not yet....and perhaps not at all if earnings continue to erode...."< then, a nonsense sentence: "even if Tech. stocks rebound this year, there's a built-in potential for a decline." Huh ? now ?, or, as with 95 % of all reporters, is he just reporting the past as if the future (a "PSYCLE sm" tenet you habve learned to recognize and take advanatge of) ? Then he writes, "despite the marked stock price drops, it's still safe to say the hype was justified." Huh ? how so ? from the publication date of this article, YOU made a mint S.T. long Techs herein, yes ? the pattern rarely changes....next....

2) in another amazing display of drivel, after Pres. Bush supposed Energy Plan ann., Thu., CNBC asked, "so, how can an investor profit from this plan in stocks ? might they begin to look into Energy stocks here ?" - unbelieveable - where the hell were these people 2-3- years ago ? 'nuff said....

c) more incorrect/misleading/sensationalized, and/or improper comments, from Fundamentalists/Companies, newspapers/magazines, etc., vs. illogical/Contrary/Unlinkable, past/present/future economic items, and/or stock price moves:
1) evidently, U.S. gasoline inventories continue to rise....interestingly, 'U.S. refinery capacity utilization' fell further from 95.6 % to 93.5 % last week....hmmmm....and people stil believe the whole Energy thing was not even partially contrived and manipulated....what a shame for us all....dont get me started again.....

d) more, likely late, incorrect, and/or misleading, comments, from Brokerage firms, NL writers, Analysts, economists, Money Managers, etc.:
1) David Moore, on Multex, 5/11, S.T. bearish, but also said, "there are many bullish factors which may mean higher stock prices...." IN other words, as with nmost all these NL guys, he has no idea, and shares less useable stuff....when asked, "what do economic factors mean to future stock prices ?"< he answered, "it depends on underlying market conditions and treaders' focus" - again, meaning, he has no idea....dig ? last, as I hear from just about every guy out there, "if the NASDAQ breaks above 2300+, on huge volume, then i will become bullish" - again, probably late/high, as usual, compared to US, yes ? 'nuff said....

3) oh, and here's one from B. Schaeffer's commentary recently, which backs me up again: his '5 rules of trading', include: 1) anything can happoen any time, 2) you dont need to know what is happening in order to make money trading, 3) the distribution of wins and losses are random, 4) an edge is only a higher probability of one thing happening over another, 5) every market moment is unique.... Well, what do YOU think of those nebullious and unhelpful tenets ? B.S. apologized in a recent 'learning from my mistakes' missive recently ....But I still see too little education and historical help with patterns from him....but I continue to give him some creedence, often as a contrary indicator, sometimes correct....and wish him the best....remember, he definitely says now, equuals Jan./Feb. in Techs....

e) more general items proving why one should probably ignore 95 % of everything else out there:
1) ?

So, as you have seen, for years now, how well one does, often, just "doing" the best 'individual' stocks, and rotating Ind. Groups, chart-technically, and sentiment-wise, mostly long-side, while ignoring, or going contrary to, 95 % of all Media messages, and "indexes/averages" comments, from the peanut gallery ? By just getting my output, alone, you do much better, and save time, by not having to even try to "seek, and process" tons of other, useless fundamental info., anyway....and we also help remove potential emotional problems for you, before they begin....

3) Most recent Hypothetical "PSYCLE sm" transactions, to be mimicked, and referred back to:

Always remember to view "1-year-at-least past" charts of everything you can view, herein, along with their 200 day moving averages (DMA's), to "see/learn" the "PSYCLE patterns", and see where/when stocks in section (3) were Hypothetically bought near lows, and put near highs....all % percentage 'Gains' are just logical ESTIMATES for L.T., ITM options, where exist, and/or on Margin, where no options exist....