1) "PSYCLE SENSE sm": new:

When I first saw Sundays's new chartbooks, I wrote "uh-oh ?" at the top, S.T., dig ? the S & P did indeed pb from its 200 DMA S.T. resistance, and, was the recent rise in the 'unweighted NYSE index' a "fobo" ? Of course, I have been giving out plenty of mostly-working Puttables regardless in I.G.'s the street hated at their lows and loved only recently, after big rises, as usual....while plenty of busted Techs remain buyable, though fewer than in April, right ?

Shockingly, since I had heard NO one out there mentioning this, a guy who follows IPO's and Secondaries offerings, said, on CNBC, Tue. 8:15 am, that May's total new stock chares issuances have been VERY high on a historical basis, and he said it even rivals last March 2000's level, after which, he said, normally portends pullbacks in many extended stocks....just something to consider, S.T. anyway....Obviously, we are surprised at the volume, but encouraged that no one picked up on this, as usual, in normal "PSYCLE sm" behavior....so, the whole market has gotten a bit miffy and messy all of a sudden, but small losses and larger gains remain the order of the day, as is exploiting both side simultaneously, in I.G. rotation, where possible....it shouyld be interesting to see how 'not wanting to buy long' "the 95 %" will be, near the next decent bottom for everything....

always try to also VIEW charts of the ones we 'just miss' to learn the patterns even further, as they were also given herein specifically as well, yes ? more proof of "PSYCLE sm" power/value....

2) "What's Been Said, and What I've Read":

a) Important Industry Group (Rotation) notes:
1) as expected, even with 'the economy being weak, which would normally be good for Bonds", the June T-bond fell towards 99....remember, it has support around 98, as i have been near-perfect on thtrading the Bond for a year now, herein, yes ? ....2) similarly, a guy Todd Salamons, whom I don't know, did share a pretty decent "June Gold sells off" chart, showing decent resistance, as I foresaw herein, from around $ 293 to $ 267, already, S.T., but also showed pot. support not too much lower, and possibility of higher breakout down the road....the support/resistance line at $ 275 extended back, he said, to Oct./Nov. 2000, March 2001, Dec. 2000, and was a 50 % retracement level between 4/2 low $ 255.8, and May 21 high of $ 293.5....

3) last Thu., a B. Schaefer desciple published a chart of the 'S & P 600 small cap index' (IJR), showing - get this - a breakout/up, drawn from 1998-99 levels....exactly as I have been intimating herein - that our general rally would broaden from April, and eventually encompass truly depressed issues, vs. the already-up ones....after pb's, this also looks higher.... 4) and, in a rare display in Daily Graphs, the "Internet- E-commerce" group looks pretty constructive.... 5) note, I added more Financial, bank/brokerage/$ mgmt., Energies as Puttables in sec. (3) and (7) below....I remain the only guy around thinking this, especially Banks.... 6) and I continue to find more busted Telecoms, including Foreign ones, long-side....

7) and, within the Energy area I still mostly dislike, another guy on CNBC, Tue. 8 am, is, as usual in the "PSYCLE sm" pattern, just beginning to like a stock like our CPST, late/high, as usual, saying, "it has some catching up to do vs. others up higher in its group" (like, HPOW, FCEL, etc., which, of course, I was first to give out herein from lows, but I digress), but all but PWER, which NO one else out there mentiones (but will, only after it, too, rises a bunch, right ?), are overbought now, dig ? ....8) I continue to like many depressed Telecom-related issues, foreign and domestic and fiber-optic, etc. - been right on a bunch, for you, herein, and wrong on a very few, so far, but 'fundamentals' will not go away on them, and we will catch several again soon....the analysts who said they had no risk at parabolic tops, now disregard them, as the pattern rarely changes....

b) more, misleading, sensationalized, Late, and/or improper/incorrect comments from the Financial Media, Reporters, etc.:
1) ....

c) more incorrect/misleading/sensationalized, and/or improper comments, from Fundamentalists/Companies, newspapers/magazines, etc., vs. illogical/Contrary/Unlinkable, past/present/future economic items, and/or stock price moves:
1) perfect "PSYCLE sm" signal: on CNBC, Fri., 11:35, a guy finally went super-bullish on TVLY, an obviously-way-too-late stocks, up from "PSYCLE sm" base near $ 10, see it ? the pattern rarely changes....ditto with WMI, here, on CNBC, another I was first to give out herein from base lows.... 2) I laughed a bit when I saw LU, poss. getting takeover by ALA, falling, right from where we sold it, herein, after liking it at lows while others hated it from lows, yes ? regardless, will watch for pot. double-bottom ?

d) more, likely late, incorrect, and/or misleading, comments, from Brokerage firms, NL writers, Analysts, economists, Money Managers, etc.:
1) I keep noticing, that, every day, B., SChaeffer just highlights a new-all-time-high-way-up stoc....and never any stock at its lows....also, Louis Navallier, Fri., loves BA only now, calling his article, "soaring forever", or something like that....next....

e) more general items proving why one should probably ignore 95 % of everything else out there:
1) ?

So, as you have seen, for years now, how well one does, often, just "doing" the best 'individual' stocks, and rotating Ind. Groups, chart-technically, and sentiment-wise, mostly long-side, while ignoring, or going contrary to, 95 % of all Media messages, and "indexes/averages" comments, from the peanut gallery ? By just getting my output, alone, you do much better, and save time, by not having to even try to "seek, and process" tons of other, useless fundamental info., anyway....and we also help remove potential emotional problems for you, before they begin....

3) Most recent Hypothetical "PSYCLE sm" transactions, to be mimicked, and referred back to:

Always remember to view "1-year-at-least past" charts of everything you can view, herein, along with their 200 day moving averages (DMA's), to "see/learn" the "PSYCLE patterns", and see where/when stocks in section (3) were Hypothetically bought near lows, and put near highs....all % percentage 'Gains' are just logical ESTIMATES for L.T., ITM options, where exist, and/or on Margin, where no options exist....