1) "PSYCLE SENSE sm": new:

O.K., we are gonna see a plethora of mostly Techs coming into nice double-and-single-bottoms ahead.... ....evidently, more BS from Tom Costello, at the close Mon., the last time the NASDAQ also fell 7 straight days, was in Dec. 1998....WRONG....not even close.... also, is meaningless, since, Techs continued their rise thereafter, dig ? I said, rise, not fall....next....

Do note how many of our depressed buys became buys again as they pulled back towards their originally given buy levels in their bases, in section (3) below ....but the market remains kinda messy....wish I had more, special, specific sage advice right here, but playing both sides at once, keeping close stops where possible, and keeping on buying depresseds and putting extendeds with I.G. rotation, all I can suggest until the turn....it happens sometimes....

always try to also VIEW charts of the ones we 'just miss' to learn the patterns even further, as they were also given herein specifically as well, yes ? more proof of "PSYCLE sm" power/value....

2) "What's Been Said, and What I've Read":

a) Important Industry Group (Rotation) notes:
1) see recent past comments here,

b) more, misleading, sensationalized, Late, and/or improper/incorrect comments from the Financial Media, Reporters, etc.:
1) 6/16 L.A.T. hedline, "stocks sink as bad news mounts" - good to see, considering likely bottoming ahead, yes ? ....

c) more incorrect/misleading/sensationalized, and/or improper comments, from Fundamentalists/Companies, newspapers/magazines, etc., vs. illogical/Contrary/Unlinkable, past/present/future economic items, and/or stock price moves:
1) long good article 5/27 L.A.T. about what is occuring in Silicon Valley downturn, nicely cites attempts at measuring the downturn through wine sales, psychiatric admission, party attendence, stock tips from service people, traffic, lines at chich eateries, etc., and, concludees, "no one knows what to make of anything here, but, job declines, so far, are at rates much les severe than after the 1990-91 economic top." Writing, "S.V. jobs fell 2,000 last month, but they are still + 30,000 ahead of this time last year...and 'spending on info. technology will rise by about 10% firward a year, less than 1/2 previous rate, but still growing a bit, and VC spending is way down, but UP 15 times its rate of 10 yrs. ago...." Interesting, huh, in that I read that NO where else, did you ? and, a big architect said he sees no evidence of cancellations or slowdowns yet....but, evidently, much fewer people attended appearance by the Dalai Lama recently, which I wonder is a sign of good or bad....and, the article concluded, "so there are a lot of people who will 'only' make $ 10 mm in 2001, instead of $ 20 mm." 'nuff said....the rich remain so, as always....

d) more, likely late, incorrect, and/or misleading, comments, from Brokerage firms, NL writers, Analysts, economists, Money Managers, etc.:
1) semi-kudos to CALPERS, for saying they are considering cutting back their exposure in Energy stocks....late/lower than I would have done for them, as you know, saving Calif. workers billions (again - don't get me started), but at least they perhaps recognize a topping area.... rare.... 2) more stories all over about 'changes to the way analysts do their thing, and are related to companies covered, etc.' - citing that buys are at least 99 % of all recommendations historically, the SEC in their infinite and always late and not always doing the best anyway stance, wants to supposedly 'secure the independence of analysts'....they cited 'never putting out sells on any tech. stocks all the way down', and 'undue influence from companies on analysts and their firms, and vice-versa'....along with the new 'Disclosure' rules crap previously recanted herein, I am sure the powers that be will ruin whatever occurs, further, from here....but the most amazing quote was from a journalist who said, "smart investors buy stocks, and they keep them, they don't sell." - which proves my "PSYCLE sm" opinions yet again, ay ? He also suggested, "analysts should tell us the best stocks to won the next 5 or 10 years, not the next 5 to 10 weeks"....which also proves all my opinions on analysts as well...

2) Jim Schmiodt of J. Hancock Funds, Tue. 8:35, CNBC, actually said, "M & A activity is as bad as it can get....stocks always do well during periods when I.R.'s fall, as we have had recently...." Uh, excuse me ? if anything, the opposite has been true, yes ? and he gets overpaid for output like that ?

e) more general items proving why one should probably ignore 95 % of everything else out there:
1) as I have mentioned previously herein, recent unnecessary and improper and unfortunate fires in NW forests point to how bad a job your govt. agencies are doing to preserve forests, paper, etc., on top of the eco-frauds-crooks.... 2) and, recent headlines, "Oil firms colluded together to raise prices", was a real shocker - not....let's see how your govt. does nothing right to rectify the situation.... manipulating refinery capacity to take advantage would normally be OK in a free market - but Energy is NOT unregulated properly, don't get me started....now, of course, oil firms want to circumvent the 'must sell only in Calif." laws....it won't end there....and, of course, Gov. Davis signed L.T., supply contracts at too-high prices....when, last summer, several Energy firms offered to ink L.T. contracts at much LOWER (you heard he right) prices than he caved in on here.... great system, ay ? last, article recently about how mnay Energy co. execs have been exercising and selling stocks options cashing in big-time....which is their right, of course, but obne said, "getting out while the going is good"....oh, and, FERC the feds, are 'saying' they are trying to help, but in reality, firms are finding ways around any 'price caps or rules' the govt. places, anyway....and, Davis saying, "with these L.T. contracts, Dynegy has been calling us saying, "we want to sell you megawatts", and we reply, "no, we don't need it, come down on the price and maybe we can work a deal."", which should make things interesting, if so, here....plus, Califl. said the state used -11 % less, elec. last mo., so consumption is down a bit, surprisingly, and, the state signed 38 L.T. contracts, with 23 close, addl., soon....their energy guy Hart said this has allowed Calif. to cut by about 1/2, the amt. of elec. it needs to buy on spot mkt., where DYN charged Calif. $ 1,900 a kwh last mo., and L.T. contracts are for under $ 100/kwh or so....hmmm.....

3) last, evidently the number of complaints about power being down have dropped a lot...and more plants are shut down, all as I predicted herein....crossing fingers....but Bush has forced Calif. to use only Ethanol, against MTBE being phased out soon, as the only 'additive' in our car gas (neither are needed, but don't get me started again), but at least slightly better for the air and Ethanol is renewable more, and less toxic, so we shall see....perhaps all this, some day, will lead to inventions of cleaner-burning fossil-fuels, etc., over time, as with coal (tho coal still has a long way to go)....

4) and big article L.A.T., 6/11, "Gauging the global fuel tank's size", which smacks of 1973 (when the 'experts' all predicted limited future supplies, remember ?, but I digress), citing supposed worldwide supply diminution beginning 2010 or so, forward, to 'little or no oil production by 2100, saying, 'ionly one barrel of new oil has been discovered for every 4 produced, since 1900"....yeah, right....Gosh, wil people EVER learn cycles, or "PSYCLES sm" ? anyway, of interest, in a are move, our Govt. people actually correctly believe than new supplies will be found with new technology (as has been the case historically), plus other sources of energy, etc. - I would add, if we can just get the eco-frauds to let us drill Alaska, Artics, tertiary recovery, and in U.S. more places, etc., and better incentives for alternative stuff like, solar, wind, cells, etc. Last, also interesting, they cite that there is a TON more supply undergraound in northern Russia and Artic regions, than in the MIddle East, and that reserves in the Middle East have been 'grossly overestimated'....but many say our 'refining/production capacity' will increase nicely all along, helping the situation, counter to the new (late, as usual) doomsayers....and, All people said "prospects for Nat. Gas supplies L.T. are much brighter"....'nuff said....

So, as you have seen, for years now, how well one does, often, just "doing" the best 'individual' stocks, and rotating Ind. Groups, chart-technically, and sentiment-wise, mostly long-side, while ignoring, or going contrary to, 95 % of all Media messages, and "indexes/averages" comments, from the peanut gallery ? By just getting my output, alone, you do much better, and save time, by not having to even try to "seek, and process" tons of other, useless fundamental info., anyway....and we also help remove potential emotional problems for you, before they begin....

3) Most recent Hypothetical "PSYCLE sm" transactions, to be mimicked, and referred back to:

Always remember to view "1-year-at-least past" charts of everything you can view, herein, along with their 200 day moving averages (DMA's), to "see/learn" the "PSYCLE patterns", and see where/when stocks in section (3) were Hypothetically bought near lows, and put near highs....all % percentage 'Gains' are just logical ESTIMATES for L.T., ITM options, where exist, and/or on Margin, where no options exist....