1) "PSYCLE SENSE sm": new:

OK, Wed./Thu., the initial wekaness from 'only' a 1/4 pot. fed rate cut, as expected, lead to more nice long Buy opportunities and pops among depresseds....an intelligent guy interviewed on CNBC immediately after the Fed's move, called for a 3/4 % drop, to 'do what they need to do to get econ. better again', and, that, he felt, the Fed would cut another 1/4 %, once or two more times, forward, with their taking much longer to act to try to effect things....just as they (the Fed) raised rates too long/high/far in the period previous to our several recent rate cuts, remember ? I predicted, and agree with, his assessment, then, and now....Greenspan kinda lost 'it' a while ago, as I was among the first to predict, 2 years ago, herein....but, again, none of this affects any of our chosen trades/ideas, anyway, right ?

In your continuing 'PSYCLE sm pattern education', assuming you viewed all the correct Energy Puts I gave you from highs, covered lately, that, again Wed., with Crude down a full $ 1., more and more 'people who loved them at their tops' are just beginning to become more negative on those stocks, dig ? just as they approach their 200 DMA's as expected....in this 'lag' effect, this, in a way, is near-perfect "PSYCLE sm" behavior, which I wish had worked better recently, especially longside (but it will again soon)....therefore, we expect pops in those stocks, not big further declines, yes ? And, Wed., CNBC announced "expect car gas prices to fall from here this summer...." An amazing statement, given their sensationalizing comments recently (similar to my being first to predict fewer blackouts in Calif., not more)....but, as I was, as usual, first to predict, "U.S. gasoline inventories rose further last month, by over 3 mm barrels, and refining cap. util. fell further, to 94.2 %", they said. Too late, as always, for non-PSYCLE traders to take advantage well enuf....also, note, Fri., cash Crude fell to $ 25 now, from $ 29 recently - but, again, too late to begin to Puts any of those, in fact, some may be close to buyable....

as I said, some $ previously in Energy, Drug, Financial, etc., should move towards Techs - but, as usual, maybe only after some Techs pop, as usual ? we shall see....remember, my concept was that, as in the March/April period, whatever transpired, however, 'the 95 %' who missed those bottoms, would likely miss these bottoms....so much for their attempts (the last several decades) to trade/time based solely on 'fundamentals/news'....we know better....again, the other recent ideaa, was to notice 'closet strength' in Puttables as a harbinger of potential pops in depressed Techs, which we may be experiencing now....this is how "PSYCLE sm" nuance sentiment and I.G. rotation often works connectedly....

always try to also VIEW charts of the ones we 'just miss' to learn the patterns even further, as they were also given herein specifically as well, yes ? more proof of "PSYCLE sm" power/value....

2) "What's Been Said, and What I've Read":

a) Important Industry Group (Rotation) notes:
1) I don't 'do' big indexes, but, as I mentioned, the OEX continues, so far, to hold the 624 area, even as the 'news' scares people, also note expected 'fobd's' among some depressed Techs....part of the bottoming process, as taught.... 2) again, obviously, some Banks and Insur. stocks are on cusp of pot. breakouts/up, so watching closely....remember, the concept is to do be in Puts in some, with close stops, always assuming some "fobo's", at extremes, just in case, but assuming some WILL work out, as with Energy, Drugs, and other groups in similar patterns past.... 3) while everyone else seemingly gets all excitedly bullish about MSFT again at 74++ Thu., note it still has resistance up here, and does not have massive upside pot. regardless ....again, these were the same people loving it at 120, and hating it at 45, yes ?

b) more, misleading, sensationalized, Late, and/or improper/incorrect comments from the Financial Media, Reporters, etc.:
1) Tue., CNBC's B. PIsani should be punished even more: twice, he actually reported supposedly negatively on telecom stocks, 'linking' it to, and I quote, "they are down on the probability of Cellular phones being banned in NYC"....uh, excuse me ? how incorrect and misleading is that ? ....2) then, their new flunky reporter, Tue. 11:38, misled massively, saying, "the financial stocks are getting hammered here, due to MER and worries about the Fed", yet NONE are down even 1 or 2 % recently, and not much more than that, recently, anyway.... don't get me started.... 2) similarly, CNBC reporters' crapola surrounding the Fed useless stuff Thu., as usual, turned out to be a waste of time and resources.... as I said, it was/is likely 'the 95 %' would miss the bottoms in Techs, and most have, so far....if 'only' a 1/4 % rate drop was/is so 'disaappointing, then how coms ewe have nice pops thereafter ? next....

3) was disappointed to hear CNBC's T. Matheson, Thu. am, did not know what the "QQQ's" were (the NASDAQ index....explains a lot, ay ?

c) more incorrect/misleading/sensationalized, and/or improper comments, from Fundamentalists/Companies, newspapers/magazines, etc., vs. illogical/Contrary/Unlinkable, past/present/future economic items, and/or stock price moves:
1) with HM getting taken over, $ 9 up Q from $ 3, note the 8 big Insider Sales much lower recently....gee, you'd think 'insiders' would have 'special knowledge', as IN-correctly assumed by 'the 95 %' (and proven countless times by me and in my Booklets), but more proof of my "PSYCLE sm", yes ? .... 2) and, for the umpteenth time, note how with I.R.'s supposed so 'low', that consumer LENDING rates credit cards, etc., remain usurically high....no greed there, ay ?

d) more, likely late, incorrect, and/or misleading, comments, from Brokerage firms, NL writers, Analysts, economists, Money Managers, etc.:
1) as expected "Big Charts" (I call their future-stock-price-predictions, "Bad Charts", based on their lousy T.R.) just went semi-negative on Energy stocks - late/low, as usual, dig ? so, as I mentioned herein, watch for some pops in the ones I share herein, S.T. anyway.... 2) MER, Tue., formally just went negative on most Tech. stocks, Telecom, Comp. stuff, etc., shocking, occuring down here as some bottoms are forming, dig ?

e) more general items proving why one should probably ignore 95 % of everything else out there:
1) ....


So, as you have seen, for years now, how well one does, often, just "doing" the best 'individual' stocks, and rotating Ind. Groups, chart-technically, and sentiment-wise, mostly long-side, while ignoring, or going contrary to, 95 % of all Media messages, and "indexes/averages" comments, from the peanut gallery ? By just getting my output, alone, you do much better, and save time, by not having to even try to "seek, and process" tons of other, useless fundamental info., anyway....and we also help remove potential emotional problems for you, before they begin....

3) Most recent Hypothetical "PSYCLE sm" transactions, to be mimicked, and referred back to:

Always remember to view "1-year-at-least past" charts of everything you can view, herein, along with their 200 day moving averages (DMA's), to "see/learn" the "PSYCLE patterns", and see where/when stocks in section (3) were Hypothetically bought near lows, and put near highs....all % percentage 'Gains' are just logical ESTIMATES for L.T., ITM options, where exist, and/or on Margin, where no options exist....