1) "PSYCLE SENSE sm": new:

Even with a few QSL's (with way more winners, in both directions), I did not expect to find more rotating ideas (se sec. (3) and (6) and (7), in new chartbook over the weekend ....especially derp. Techs, many of which still look VVG....and, also found some more Puttables ideas/groups....

Of interest, my NYSE long, and puts, lists, are the shortest I can remember....I need to go back decades and see what happened thereafter, the last times that happened by me....but I have a feeling, it was good for the NASDAQ depr. techs, dig ?

similarly, Ralph Bloch, Raymond James, Mon. 12:30 CNBC, echoed what everone out there sees, a trading range, etc., yuckiness, but he sees (as I do) a pot. H & S bottom in the DJIA, with lower vol. we need, as I teach....

always try to also VIEW charts of the ones we 'just miss' to learn the patterns even further, as they were also given herein specifically as well, yes ? more proof of "PSYCLE sm" power/value....

2) "What's Been Said, and What I've Read":

a) Important Industry Group (Rotation) notes:
1) as usual, I was the first/only to have given out many extended Apparel stocks from recent highs down nicely.... 2) and, of course, the only-very-recent articles/Media treatments that possibly, "the semi. chip sector has bottomed", is a sign to take some QL % Gains (as we have herein) after their initial stage 1 rises, yes ? the pattern rarely changes....

b) more, misleading, sensationalized, Late, and/or improper/incorrect comments from the Financial Media, Reporters, etc.:
1) finally,big recent headlines about cash Coffee commod. making new 30-year lows, to $ 477. a ton - late, as usual, dig ? of interest, they actually wrote, "I see no hope....I just see it going down forever...." Neat, huh, PSYCLE-wise....the 1965 low was actually $ 444. a ton, but don't get me started....did you know, behind Brazil, the 2nd biggest coffee producer is now -get this - Vietnam ? .... 2) a story-come-on from CNBC, Mon., was, "if you own stocks, you can't afford not to know their earnings", which, of course, is ppure misleading, incorrect, B.S., but still proves that nothing changes in the Media....

c) more incorrect/misleading/sensationalized, and/or improper comments, from Fundamentalists/Companies, newspapers/magazines, etc., vs. illogical/Contrary/Unlinkable, past/present/future economic items, and/or stock price moves:
1) an actually decent treatise in 8/4 L.A.T. by T. Petruno, re: how, in order to match past supposed pattern, stocks would have to rise a LOT by year-end, vs. all the Fed rate cuts - of course, he says this late, and everyone knows this already, dig ? of course, he will only go bulish after when/if techs rise a bunch, yes ? I still see current atmosphere similar to mid 1984 or Fall of 1990, or summer 1998, but I don't have an overrated lucky-to-have column in a major newspaper.... 3) did anyone else read how 'ropfits' at PCG and EIX actually rose a TON last Q ? sure, they are not paying their previous bills....don't get me started....but I did at least give them out from lows herein for you....not many others can say that....anyway, they said that PCG had - get this - $ 3.75 Billion in cash now....up from $ 1.60 B. 12/31/00....their "cash and S.T. invmts. will be adequate to maintain operations through and beyond 2001." Last, a planned Calif. $ 12.5 B. 'energy bond' offering due out soon, the largest in U.S. history, remains in jeopardy, by me....proceeds are supposed to be repaid from raised elec. rates in Calif. - good luck....as Calif. falls further towards bankruptcy itself as a partial result....Last, as I surmised herein when I alone called the S.T. top in the energy crisis in Calif., recent L.A.T. article said that avg. temp. in Calif. was 3 degrees lower than expected/normal, helping hold down total elec. usage.... and I therefore predict(ed) that Aug./Sep. should be hotter as a result....so not counting money yet....

4) in the latest dangerously misleading govt. announcement (re-read my booklets), Tue., Media said that, "U.S. industrial output 'productivity' ROSE, surprisingly, the most over the previous years' Q, in a while, the most recent Q...." - but, in reality, 'productivity only 'rose', because of all the cutbacks, expense cutting, and layoffs/firings within corporations, dig ? so, of course, 'output per person' may have risen - but, tons of decent people have been downsized....so, not a VG report, ay ? and, once again, what is 'good' for a company, is not necessarily good for the economy....

d) more, likely late, incorrect, and/or misleading, comments, from Brokerage firms, NL writers, Analysts, economists, Money Managers, etc.:
1) ....

e) more general items proving why one should probably ignore 95 % of everything else out there:
1) as if you didn't know, recent L.A.T. proved my feelings that "infrastructure spending' nationwide has fallen, as a % of GDP, the last 10 years, and continues to fall that way.....things like, roads, schools, water/sewer, elec., airports, etc. So one wonders how much more messed up things might get forward.... 2) and epiulogue on Calif. energy crap, shows that, "if elec. rate hikes had been allowed to happen earlier, instead of Gov. Davis messing things up, allowing for energy supply firms to greedily raise too much, later, then consumers would have conserved more, sooner, which would have tempered the crisis, sooner...." an interesting conclusion - only after the fact, as usual....gee, shouldn't the 'exterts' have known this and made this publically known, earlier, as well ? last, as to the rebates for people who cut usage, they mentioned how 'people who already used little elc. get no discounts, and may even get increases forward, in their rates." yup.

So, as you have seen, for years now, how well one does, often, just "doing" the best 'individual' stocks, and rotating Ind. Groups, chart-technically, and sentiment-wise, mostly long-side, while ignoring, or going contrary to, 95 % of all Media messages, and "indexes/averages" comments, from the peanut gallery ? By just getting my output, alone, you do much better, and save time, by not having to even try to "seek, and process" tons of other, useless fundamental info., anyway....and we also help remove potential emotional problems for you, before they begin....

3) Most recent Hypothetical "PSYCLE sm" transactions, to be mimicked, and referred back to:

Always remember to view "1-year-at-least past" charts of everything you can view, herein, along with their 200 day moving averages (DMA's), to "see/learn" the "PSYCLE patterns", and see where/when stocks in section (3) were Hypothetically bought near lows, and put near highs....all % percentage 'Gains' are just logical ESTIMATES for L.T., ITM options, where exist, and/or on Margin, where no options exist....