1) "PSYCLE SENSE sm": new:

Real bad day, Wed., a shocker, much weakness....stepping back, stunned....but one should be appreciative of having at least some new Puts, on stocks which are falling, in sec. (5).... similar pattern as usual for them....while continuing to accumulate depr. techs which have maintained their patterns through all this lately, and seing still, pot. double-bottoms abounding ahead....that's all one can say in these dog-days periods....

(note, for the first time I can recall, I did not have any quotes, Tue. nor Wed., some lame 'code red virus' crap from my 'packet servers', nothing to do with me or my system....everyone abdicates blame, as usual in America....but I got poor substitute in meantime, just infuriating and uindeserved by me...

always try to also VIEW charts of the ones we 'just miss' to learn the patterns even further, as they were also given herein specifically as well, yes ? more proof of "PSYCLE sm" power/value....

2) "What's Been Said, and What I've Read":

a) Important Industry Group (Rotation) notes:
1) and speaking of Coffee's 30-year low, I recently saw a nice depr. saucer in cash commodity Cocoa chart, from around 9. a ton....projects towards the 11.00 area....rotation, dig ? ....2) hey, having, as usual, been the first to calll a S.T. bottom in Brazil/Argentina, story Wed. said, "Argentina Bonds up nicely, as hopes for more help from IMF grow...." the pattern rarely changes.... 2) might the Energy/Oil service stocks form V.S.T. double-bottoms soon ? some not showing strength expected in stage 5 or 6.... 3) a recent institutional report from Raymond James, cites, what I have been saying recently, that several depr. 'online/E-broker' stocks are prime candidates for mergers or similar, ahead....ignore them at your risk, I say....

4) Multex's David Sterman, whose past L.T.T.R. we are not told, is at least trying to do what I am: find depr. Tech./Internet stocks, whose sales are actually growing, and who are still profitable, and he came up with these, which I will check as well: ALOT, NETB, TMPW, VRSN, TMCS, EBAY, NETE....of course, I gave you NETE long at recent low, and EBAY put at recent top.... 5) also, cash Copper has new intermediate term low, has fallen from 80 cents to 67 cents since May....historically, remember, going WAY back, the 50 area has held, so watching for that, but probably not yet....

b) more, misleading, sensationalized, Late, and/or improper/incorrect comments from the Financial Media, Reporters, etc.:
1) an actually interesting item from Pisani, Thu. am, about how he sees "way fewer stock buybacks from corporations, this year" - true, as I was first/only to illuminate/predict a while ago herein....recent MER study showed exactly what i suggested - that 2/3 of all 'announced' buybacks never fulfill (where are the company's liabilities ? don't get me started), and, obviously, as I predicted at the Tech. tops, companies don't have the bucks, and they are scared as well, yes ? ....2) once again, an inorant, misleading, deceptive, incorrect statement, puffed to make a story where none exists', from CNBC's Bill Griffeth, Fri. 9;23, "small cap stocks have had a GREAT year so far"....then his interviewee shyly said, "uh, actually, they are DOWN for this year, many down 30-40-50 %...." To which B.G. just moved on....shame on him, again....

c) more incorrect/misleading/sensationalized, and/or improper comments, from Fundamentalists/Companies, newspapers/magazines, etc., vs. illogical/Contrary/Unlinkable, past/present/future economic items, and/or stock price moves:
1) the first potentially good consumer note, reported at close Tue., evidently, nationwide 'consumer debt' FELL - that's right, fell - for the first time since late 1997 (just B4 a big rise in stocks in some similar patterns as now, BTW), -$ 1.5 B, when it had been expected to rise + $ 8.0 B....neat.... 2) file this under, 'well, duh...' (predicted herein among first): Multex (too late, and not predicted near top, as I did, of course, as usual) on 8/8, article, titled, "Getting out at the bottom", correctly pointed out, that tons of VC's imnvested near tops in Internet/Techs, and, now, are trying to get out, only after huge drops, yadda, yadda....gee, if they only had read nmy NL back then, ay ? I would have saved them billions....next.... Harry Edelstone, who invests in VC's for Ford, PG, Intel, ACN, EDS, etc. (and who acknowledged many of their investments are down hugely, with no stops, but I digress), wrote, "Once they are invested in, they are stuck...." Gee, another point for liquid stocks, vs. VC partnerships, yes ? he also mentioned, "VC investments take $ away from other corporate needs/uses, like, R & D, mktg., etdc." My sentiments as well....he says current cycle is similar to the 1970's, saying, "Intel has huge losses in over (get this) 500 companies they have invested in." Without any stop-loss provisions or technical analysis or protective or speculative puts, I might add....hey, guys, I have continued to be here, if contacted....next....

3) as to UTHR, 11 to 12.64 to 8.77 to 14. in 2 days, with trading halt in middle, rumor FDA would not approve drug, then did approve drug, just proves the heinous nature of 95 % of all Media output....

d) more, likely late, incorrect, and/or misleading, comments, from Brokerage firms, NL writers, Analysts, economists, Money Managers, etc.:
1) editorial in WSJ 8/6, "as stocks fall, resist the call of the Bears", by Jon Clemens (whose credentials and L.T. past T.R.. we are dangerously not given), wrote, "recently, I have been beseiged by investor e-mails asking about covrered call writing and shorting....this worries me...." He writes, that, as I teach (usually) "That 'extra income from selling calls' comes at a huge price....people are always talking about whatever worked the LAST 12 months, always in hindsight....if younear lows in 1994 and 1996, people asked me the same thing." (get it ?) "such bets can go badly awry....if the stock written rises, one gets called away and loses it, as it rises further often...." (but not in recent past year of two NASDAQ, ay ?)...."but unlike past stockholders who just want extra income and L.T. holdings, today's option writers are mostly tech. stock losers who can't admit their mistakes and take losses higher, etc." (another "PSYCLE sm" tenet), " and with option premiums at a historic low" (as I suggested herein recently, BTW), "this is a kind of cop-out." as you know, this is correct, as I have been teaching for decades....good job, Mr. C....he writes, "either the stock should be held or not - if you shouldn't own it, then sell the stock, not the calls...." Still a semi-debatable comment, but worth mentioning these days....He also pointed out that, through the Tech. decline, investors have continued to put over $ 100 B. net, into growth M. funds (which seems real low to ME< but I digress),....but then, as usual, he ruined the rest of his article by not concluding anything or teaching ny patterns with regard to shorting by investors figurews, etc.

e) more general items proving why one should probably ignore 95 % of everything else out there:
1) obviously, this week, I laughed as the Northeast began to have 'energy/elec./power' problems due to a heat wave....gee, all the smarmy people who slammed Calif. for months, are now possibly getting a taste of it....what oges around, comes around, ay ? I of course wish them well, but, as I have been teaching for decades, it's always something, somewhere, and again proves my "PSYCLE sm" concept of I.G. rotation, yes ? That's why I try to be nice to everyone worthy, all the time....

So, as you have seen, for years now, how well one does, often, just "doing" the best 'individual' stocks, and rotating Ind. Groups, chart-technically, and sentiment-wise, mostly long-side, while ignoring, or going contrary to, 95 % of all Media messages, and "indexes/averages" comments, from the peanut gallery ? By just getting my output, alone, you do much better, and save time, by not having to even try to "seek, and process" tons of other, useless fundamental info., anyway....and we also help remove potential emotional problems for you, before they begin....

3) Most recent Hypothetical "PSYCLE sm" transactions, to be mimicked, and referred back to:

Always remember to view "1-year-at-least past" charts of everything you can view, herein, along with their 200 day moving averages (DMA's), to "see/learn" the "PSYCLE patterns", and see where/when stocks in section (3) were Hypothetically bought near lows, and put near highs....all % percentage 'Gains' are just logical ESTIMATES for L.T., ITM options, where exist, and/or on Margin, where no options exist....