1) "PSYCLE SENSE sm": new:

A huge, unexpected moment-of-truth right here, for a ton of depressed stocks....recent past months' action actually makes all those perma-bulls not too bright (at least we buy only near lows, with close stops, diversified, with no 'scenarios')....recent QSL's have been quite shocking to me, unusual....But, as I said, I bet NONE of you bought any new Puts recently, even as many of mine did work, did you ? if not, why not ? (how many times have I said THAT herein, during drops ?)

This said, since I was the only guy around to foresee the last nice S.T. rises among basing Tech. stocks, seeing semi-similar patterns now in the new chartbook, will people again not take advantage ? If so, it won't be because of my very helpful output....check out section (3) below....and section (6)....a real mish-mosh, which, I guess, as I was first to predict earlier this year, showing more lingering, broadening, L.T. attractiveness of many depressed stocks....some may form longer bases, some may be QSL's in the meantime, but one must get in some down here with stops, regardless....

Oh, so only now, after L.T. big rises , now, Fri., your Govt. says, "high Energy prices may engender economic risk to the USA"....hey, guys, thanks for nothing....late, as usual....oh, and for, now, they are probably getting into things best left to the marketplace....

Just for the record, since 1950, Sept. has easily been THE worst month for the S & P, in fact, the ONLY month with an avg. decline (Aug. is 2nd worst, unch. avg.)....as you know, if you have been getting my NL for years past, the Nov., Dec., Jan. months have easily been the best....

CNBC's Scott Cohen, trying to 'create' a we-know-it-is-useless bearish story, misleadingly said, Fri., 8:35, that "lots more people have been Shorting stock lately", when, in fact, general levels of shorting has remained pretty much the same for months now....oy....of course, he only mentions this, after price drops, dig ? the pattern rarely changes....

I laughed when I saw INTC on Friday....hah, hah, "but, Jim, its such a great company, the best mgmt. around, everyone needs them forever, will grow forever, no risk, you just don't understand the fundamentals, etc." yeah, right....Sounds like what they said about tons of similar stocks, like, MSFT, MO, etc., at their tops....how many stocks 'only I predicted falls from tops on', in the last few years, have I said THAT about, herein ? the street is strewn here, with 'previously supposedly stellar companies' stocks, now down over -50 % each, in recent months, yes ? and they pay those analysts for their useless crap ! amazing, huh....don't get me started....

Meanwhile, note how many potential puttables have been removed, and how small my current Put list is, dig ? simultaneously, my longest section (3) longside list in a long time (pun intended), even as some have question mark ?

2) "What's Been Said, and What I've Read":

a) Important Industry Group (Rotation) notes:
1) note, exactly as I was first/only to foresee herein for you, the "10-yr. T-bond chart" did indeed prtend a S.T. pop in I.R.'s, already.... 2) allied, note S.T. declines I was, again, the first and certainly the only guy, to have predicted well, yet again, among many Extended Financial groups/stocks.... 3) and, might some Food/Grocery, and Aero./Def., issues improve soon ? if so, I will again be the first to notice and share that.... 4) so cash Crude Oil must rise forever , ay ? already down 15 % at least S.T., note declines only I predicted herein for you, in Energy/Oil Service stocks, many laready down towards their initial downside levels, 200 DMA's....now too late to begin to buy puts on them, dig ? ....5) in addition to the supposedly 'bulletproof' Commun. stocks down a bunch, as the 'overpaid analysts' blew it, note further drop in EK, LXK, PRD, etc., in the 'printing' biz, hah....

b) more, misleading, sensationalized, Late, and/or improper/incorrect comments from the Financial Media, Reporters, etc.:
1) a totally BS story by another ignorant CNBC gal reporter, Fri., 8:40, polled investors at local discount firm (dont get me started), and concluded, "the consensus here seems to be that, regardless of the S.T. direction, the market will go up eventually"....? Gee, thanks, for nothing.... 2) a VERY misleading headline, 9/22, L.A.T., "Schwab stock soars amid merger rumors....", when, in fact, it had previously fallen/broken lows, nicely, and only popped that day, maybe 4, to 34....certainly NOT "soared", dig ? next....re-read my "Scenarios" and "Media" booklets.... 3) the idiots at CNBC, Mon., 12:15, misleadingly headlined, "Lucent stock got hammered today, falling to under $ 31", when, in fact, it is no longer down much anymore, having Already fallen from 84 in Dec. '99, when they reported so bullishly on it, right ?, next.... 4) Tom (don't get me started) Petruno, 9/24, L.A.T., finally getting bullish L.T. on the US dollar (late, as usual, when I, on TV, was the among the very first guys to predict its previous rise, several years ago), commenting on the huge drop in INTC stock (which , as usual, he did not predict), actually wrote, "which side was the smarter, at $ 47, the sellers or the buyers, we'll have to wait and see".....uh, gee, I wonder, the holders from over 70, who sold under 50, quickly ? or the sellers over 70 ? amazing....

c) more incorrect/misleading/sensationalized, and/or improper comments, from Fundamentalists/Companies, newspapers/magazines, etc., vs. illogical/Contrary/Unlinkable, past/present/future stock price moves:
1) those two useless/lucky guys L.A.T., 9/19, both love MGG up here, and both hate UIS, down here....the oppposite of how I see them, dig ? ....2) this one is classic: recall recently how all the ignorant analysts said that companies like GT would obviously benefit from Fireston'es misfortunes ? well, I got you into GT around 20, out at 27 on the news (the pattern rarely changes), and/but, now, under 20, so all those managers have losses for their clients....ha.... 3) Tue., Germany announced they will be seloing their 58 % stake in "DT", right near its low, only after big drop the did nothing to protect their people during, which only I predicted herein for you.... recall, I was also the first to predict its previous rise, from the $ 20. area, when on TV, in 1998.... where are the accolades ?

d) more, likely late, incorrect, and/or misleading, comments, from Brokerage firms, NL writers, Analysts, economists, Money Managers, etc.:
1) recall when I mentioned Carl Icahn buying GM, late ? well, last week, he said he had sold his stake (don't get me started), for a small gain only, not even near recent S.T. top....only held for 4-5- weeks....are people so starved to follow a guy like that, vs. learning and employing a great concept on their own, with higher returns, like mine ? yup....he 'only' made 4-5- %, in a month (nice)....

e) more general items proving why one should probably ignore 95 % of everything else out there:
1) ?

So, as you have seen, for years now, how well one does, often, just "doing" the best 'individual' stocks, and rotating Ind. Groups, chart-technically, and sentiment-wise, mostly long-side, while ignoring, or going contrary to, 95 % of all Media messages, and "indexes/averages" comments, from the peanut gallery ? By just getting my output, alone, you do much better, and save time, by not having to even try to "seek, and process" tons of other, useless fundamental info., anyway....and we also help remove potential emotional problems for you, before they begin....

3) Most recent Hypothetical "PSYCLE sm" transactions, to be mimicked, and referred back to:

Always remember to view "1-year-at-least past" charts of everything you can view, herein, along with their 200 day moving averages (DMA's), to "see/learn" the "PSYCLE patterns", and see where/when stocks in section (3) were Hypothetically bought near lows, and put near highs....all % percentage 'Gains' are just logical ESTIMATES for L.T., ITM options, where exist, and/or on Margin, where no options exist....