1) "PSYCLE SENSE sm": new:

First, as you have been taught, 'after the first hour or two on Tues.', as usual, should see at least S.T. end to many drops....second, this has now been THE worst S.T. period for longsiders I can remember....but, still, not really all that bad a period due to stops, and giving you many longside winners recently as well, etc.

Everyone I know has shut down....illogically....so, sentiment-wise, you should know what THAT means....they should be staying with the program, actually learning to buy more after occasional rough periods, yes ? Interesting -- while they are getting whacked in their extended Techs, YOU are also getting pops in our 'old economy' depr. stocks, yes ? 'nuff said....and, of course, YOU have, again, not had any Puts recently, right ? and you blame someone other than yourself ? how illogical is that ? everything you need, has been herein....

as I taught you, there is no such thing as a 'bulletproof' "safe" quality STOCK....like, MSFT, INTC, AAPL, long-distance stocks, blue-chip consumer stocks, etc. maybe a 'company', but not a 'stock', as they are always two different things, right ? this is so cool....millions of people, and tons of funds and managers, are 'stuck' in dozens of big-name downers, without stops, for months now....what will they do ? as usual, probably nothing....but not YOU, right ? I am here for ya....

2) "What's Been Said, and What I've Read":

a) Important Industry Group (Rotation) notes:
1) seeing another in a long line of depr. stocks only I gave out herein from hated lows, get taken over = SDW, Friday, note, it was/is a 'cement' co., despised by all, because it supposedly had no 'sexiness'....yeah, right, I guess $ 15 to $ 70, even in 2 or 3 years, stinks, huh....next.... 2) note, added more depr. Chem, in section (6) below....as usual, I will be the first/only to do so.... 3) buy, we sure were the first to give the previously depressed Regional Banks stocks herein for you from lows, back then, ay ? neat....a small list in section (4), FYI....most all now sales on strength - just as 'the 95 %' being to like them, as usual, right ? also, note higher highs in more of the depr. basing Techs I gave you herein at lows, which I could get no one to buy down there, remember ? ....4) and, check the extended Elec. Util. stocks in section (7) below....as usual, if true, I will again be the first/only to put them.... 5) also note, I 're-added' several puttables in section (7) below....and, in section (5), more puttables having further drops, as a second stage down (re-read my Downside Booklet).... 6) and, more Energy puttables, section (7) as well.... 7) note, I was, again, the first and only, to have given you depr. Chem. stocks bouncing, herein, like, PX, ROH, HPC, DOW, SEE, GY, ARG, etc., yes ? by the time 'the street' even remotely likes them, you will have gains, as usual....the pattern rarely changes....remember, this was a partially 'linked' trade opp. the Energies topping S.T., right ? and you still fight these successful patterns ?

b) more, misleading, sensationalized, Late, and/or improper/incorrect comments from the Financial Media, Reporters, etc.:
1) this one will be perfect: Mon., CNBC's eve. story grabber, was, "all the kids want 'em....will scooter stocks be hot ?"....as usual, late, too high, etc., dig ? the pattern rarely changes.... 2) and, 10/1 front-page headline L.A.T., Walter Hamilton column (don't get me started), "Volatile Market Tempts More into Selling 'short'", writing, "all but written off as a hopeless strategy in the 1990's, short selling is again on the rise...." Showing chart of shorted NASDAQ shares, rising from 1.8 bill. shs. early 1999, to 3.2 bill. shs. now, he neglected to mention hedged by tons of options, but that's something only a nice, good reporter would have mentioned, ay ? Plus, he mentioned "many traders have been shrting as NASDAQ techs have been falling...." But, gee, guy, NO firm will allow anyone to do that, except on an 'uptick'....you'd think a head financial writer would know that....and, anyway, note, as usual, this article only comes out AFTER many big drops among Tech. stocks, dig ? the pattern rarely changes....but he did properly point out that, "the 10 (supposedly) biggest short-selling pros tracked by Morgan Keegan, have lost money for 5 straight years now....but are up + 7.3 % so far this year...."

c) more incorrect/misleading/sensationalized, and/or improper comments, from Fundamentalists/Companies, newspapers/magazines, etc., vs. illogical/Contrary/Unlinkable, past/present/future stock price moves:
1) L.A.T. headline story, 9/29, "Good Times in Store at Bergen Brunswig ?" , as usual, late, at 'new 52-wk. high', when I was first/only to give out BBC at basing low herein for you, ay ? the pattern rarely changes.... 2) and, as usual, Mon. 10:45 am, CNBC had pres. of HNCS on -- bullishly -- interesting, since, when I was the first to give it as base buy herein for you, around $ 40 (now $ 80+), NO one wanted to hear about it, dig ?

d) more, likely late, incorrect, and/or misleading, comments, from Brokerage firms, NL writers, Analysts, economists, Money Managers, etc.:
1) ....

e) more general items proving why one should probably ignore 95 % of everything else out there:
1) good point: a guy on CNBC, pointed out that, hidden from all view dishonestly, NO 'tax plan' by either political candidate (don't get me started on politics) will prevent 1 mm people from owing/paying the AMT (more, technically), instead of the reg. tax rate (lower, technically), on their earnings, forward....plus, making things less flexible for those successful people....

So, as you have seen, for years now, how well one does, often, just "doing" the best 'individual' stocks, and rotating Ind. Groups, chart-technically, and sentiment-wise, mostly long-side, while ignoring, or going contrary to, 95 % of all Media messages, and "indexes/averages" comments, from the peanut gallery ? By just getting my output, alone, you do much better, and save time, by not having to even try to "seek, and process" tons of other, useless fundamental info., anyway....and we also help remove potential emotional problems for you, before they begin....

3) Most recent Hypothetical "PSYCLE sm" transactions, to be mimicked, and referred back to:

Always remember to view "1-year-at-least past" charts of everything you can view, herein, along with their 200 day moving averages (DMA's), to "see/learn" the "PSYCLE patterns", and see where/when stocks in section (3) were Hypothetically bought near lows, and put near highs....all % percentage 'Gains' are just logical ESTIMATES for L.T., ITM options, where exist, and/or on Margin, where no options exist....