1) "PSYCLE SENSE sm": new:

Neat, look at the already-big Q gains among our depr. Techs. over the holiday, seasonality, as expected....even given some QSL's....also keep in mind, most of the normal "PSYCLE sm" tax-selling has been done, and many people have been turned-off, so we should be OK for a while on our longs, with close stops, yes ? there remain a ton of busted Techs the others loved from their highs, as usual, which are potentially buyable down here....or are you going to miss them yet again ? consequently, note the large number of potential buys long added in section (6) below....you know what that usually means....oh, and Arnold Bleichroeder Cp. says that with the 541 new lows on the NASDAQ on 11/22, the highest in so long, they believe, as you know I do, that that huge # of recent lows are likely to be 'it', for a while, as these stocks bottom ahead....

One can learn my normal H & S pattern by viewing our recent Put gainers, yes ? as usual, their first downside target, around still-rising 200-DMA.... recall my 3-weeks-ago mention that the AAII had only 8 % bearish members, before the recent EVB declines, dig ? and did you know, that supposedly, the -44 % decline so far in the NASDAQ index, is its largest since 1973-74 ?

While I am a bit shocked at some longsiders breaking for VS, QSL's here, this week's selling in NASD stocks should be, at worst, the beginning of the end of the 'tax selling' for this year, and, as you know, over the 20+ years I have been doing this, this season forward, has often been VERY good for "PSYCLE sm" traders, historically, into early the next year, etc.

2) "What's Been Said, and What I've Read":

a) Important Industry Group (Rotation) notes:
1) though I certainly missed them (they had not properly set up anyway recently), many Paper stocks may do so, ahead.... 2) again, now that everyone else who missed them when I gave them to you herein from lows, loves the Tobacco, Insurance, stocks, well, you know what we did in section (7) below.... 3) and, many Telecoms continue to look EVB-like, as those who loved them at their highs wherefrom I put them herein for you, hate them now....the pattern NEVER changes, does it ? ....4) with the SOX semi. index making a new low, recall who was the first/only to give its very-obvious-at-that-time S.T. perfect "PSYCLE sm" rolling top, herein, for you, yes ? glad I could, again, help....where are the accomlades and the publicity ?

b) more, misleading, sensationalized, Late, and/or improper/incorrect comments from the Financial Media, Reporters, etc.:
1) Tue. noon, CNBC's Bob Pisani ridiculously said, "ANN stock is getting hit, from 37 to 30, on worries about earnings, etc." Funny, how, that's what 'they' also said when I was certainly the first/only to have given ANN as one of several correctly-timesd depressed Retail stocks near its/their lows herein, earlyier in Y2K ("but, Jim, Y2K fears, and the hot Internet buying sites are going to put bricks-and-mortar retailers out of business...." yadda, yadda, as usual, the pattern rarely changes....I also gave out ANN and similar others, in 1997-98 from $ 11-12 for up triple thereafter, remember ? ....2) 11/26 L.A.T., Mr. T.P. (Petruno, aptly named, ay ?) now says, "too much fear may spread from NASD stoicks to those not yet down, of blue-chip ilk", etc. Excuse me, but exactly which stocks would THOSE be ? Since, as you did not mention, probably 2/3 of "blue-chip' stocks are/were already down big-time, BEFORE the NASD stocks 'parabolicked', yes ? Then, he only showed table of 'blue chip bear markets' since 1956....which he never showed near their tops, when he could have been a more valuable resource, yes ? he seems to be bearish, now, on both, the NASD and blue-chips.... so you know what to do, yes ? contrarily fade him soon !

c) more incorrect/misleading/sensationalized, and/or improper comments, from Fundamentalists/Companies, newspapers/magazines, etc., vs. illogical/Contrary/Unlinkable, past/present/future stock price moves:
1) Barrons 11/20, "is the market to blame for PPS woes ?", gives normal BS 'reasons' (re-read my Booklet) supposedly 'why' PPS stock tanked -- when, I gave you its easily-seen rolling top formation....next.... 2) a story on CNBC, Tue. 11:50, actually said, that ALL "DSL" companies have "business models that were never built for profitability, even as demand continues to grow for their products/services"....can you believe that ? and they don't get arrested for taking VC and stockbuyers' monies ?

d) more, likely late, incorrect, and/or misleading, comments, from Brokerage firms, NL writers, Analysts, economists, Money Managers, etc.:
1) Bernie Schaeffer, on Multex, 11/27, recently said (don't get me started) that, if Bush wins, the energy, tobacco, drug, and HMO stocks will do best, and, if Gore wins, the mortgage, banks, environmental stocks 'will benefiit most'....need I say more ? contrary-wise ? get it ? ....2) then, he now likes FITB, AIG, C, at tops mind you....oy....and, he dislikes NT down here, favoring CMVT up here instead....he really likes extended Insur. and Brokers from up here....he also dislikes CSCO down here, a point at which I actually like it, VSTO.... 3) MSDW now likes LU, unusual given its pattern and that they loved it all the way down.... 4) and the aptly named Motley Fool, recently said, "the stock market opportunities in network storage are huge" (where have they been the past few years ? but I digress), and loves, BRCD @ 220, VRTS @ 120, NTAP @ 80, EMC @ 85+....as you know, I was the first/only to have given these as Puts herein from recent highs for you....and, even if they turn oput to be correct S.T., what kind of small % gains might they have, vs. OUR kinds of stocks whehn we are correct ?

e) more general items proving why one should probably ignore 95 % of everything else out there:
1) ?

So, as you have seen, for years now, how well one does, often, just "doing" the best 'individual' stocks, and rotating Ind. Groups, chart-technically, and sentiment-wise, mostly long-side, while ignoring, or going contrary to, 95 % of all Media messages, and "indexes/averages" comments, from the peanut gallery ? By just getting my output, alone, you do much better, and save time, by not having to even try to "seek, and process" tons of other, useless fundamental info., anyway....and we also help remove potential emotional problems for you, before they begin....

3) Most recent Hypothetical "PSYCLE sm" transactions, to be mimicked, and referred back to:

Always remember to view "1-year-at-least past" charts of everything you can view, herein, along with their 200 day moving averages (DMA's), to "see/learn" the "PSYCLE patterns", and see where/when stocks in section (3) were Hypothetically bought near lows, and put near highs....all % percentage 'Gains' are just logical ESTIMATES for L.T., ITM options, where exist, and/or on Margin, where no options exist....