1) "PSYCLE SENSE sm": new:

While more latecomers, as usual, just begin to buy already-up stocks, we continue to catch group after group, even some puttables, better than they....I told you we'd hear talk of dow 10 K again....of course, Q. is whether we get more pb's B4 more rises, and, unless one only buys like us, low, further huge rises in already-up stocks are not likely, also sentiment has gotten less bearish, which can't help their case.... and, again, the S & P and DJIA both are very close to their still-falling 200-DMA's, hence all the Gains I have suggested taking recently....I am glad to be of such help....

among many things, I am proud of my recent long buy list including a bunch of L.T.-ITM-calls possibilities, in "over $ 20-semi-blue-chip" stocks for ya....of course, almost none of my valued clients ever take proper advantage of them when so, so I am hopeful, again, to be able to help them....

A new web site, 'stockcharts.com', I am now following, cited a NASDAQ bullish % index', of a potential 'leading' indicator, of breadth and P & F charts, which recently is beginning to get overbought, and they showed the last several times indicator was up here after oversold rallies, and they caution a bit as well as me....wish i had their in-writing, L.T. past T.R., but I like their site and available services, so will add them to my 'decent people' list....and heed their agreeing-with-me advise here....like me, they also like some laggard I.G.'s down here, un-rallied yet, and some puttables nearresistance for pb's likely....

and, just when I was actually gonna maybe listen to something Value Line said, I got recent services from them, and, counter to what I had previously reported herein, their recent, and even near the 9/21 bottom, was NOT a 'super-oversold-high' on their indicators (dgms), as was suggested....so, there WAS no 'massive buy signal', any time near lows, dig ? geez, am I among the very few guys left who can do this decently to any substantial degree ?

so, we gave you plenty of exploiutable puts into the Sept. period, then caught the lows in tons of I.G.'s, like, apparel, steel, energy, and Tons of kinds of Tech-orienteds, and others, for ya, and, recently, possibly many V.S.T.-anyway tops, and resistance rollover, and some new rotating puttables, and longs as catch-up laggards ahead....glad to have heloed so much, and i look forward to doing even more so from here, thanks for the faith....

always try to also VIEW charts of the ones we 'just miss' to learn the patterns even further, as they were also given herein specifically as well, yes ? more proof of "PSYCLE sm" power/value....

2) "What's Been Said, and What I've Read":

a) Important Industry Group (Rotation) notes:
1) most all the Airlines I was firstto give out herein from lows, are beginning to fill down-gaps, so starting to lighten up.... 2) and, again, looks like I was the first/only to give out recently-depressed Energies, bouncing already, neat, hope you got some....and, maybe, some Golds again ? ....3) I laughed listening to analysts on CNBC, Tue., lamenting"how financial and bank stocks can be falling with interest rates falling and so low", etc. - hah....gee, guys, haven't you seen rates UP recently ? idiots, the pattern rarely changes.... 4) two quickies, viewing L.T. charts, Gold still forming nice saucer, and the T-bond remains in a L.T. uptrend, just a pb recently, keep in mind....

5) the T-bond has now fallen from 111+ to 102+ since just 11/1....but, as I expected/mentioned, remains in akinda L.T. uptrend, so don't get all bearish on the Bond just yet, I just called the recent S.T. bottom in I.R.'s, for now....may just base for a while, dig ? ....6) recall when I again correctly pointed out a L.T. multiple-time bottom in cash Copper, herein, back around spring of 1999 ? (it of course rose from 61 to 94 by Oct. 2000), and, more recently, suggested another around the 61 cent level ?, well, seems we were right again, as recent not-reported-by-media (dgms) pop already towards 71 cents....I gave you PD and a coupld other metals here from recent lows, but missed them in this NL....but that/this does say something better-than-negative about the 'world's economy', dig ?

b) more, misleading, sensationalized, Late, and/or improper/incorrect comments from the Financial Media, Reporters, etc.:
1) continuing shame on the L.A. times, for showing ridiculously short-term, misleading, and incomplete and improper perspective charts, most recently, of T-bond rates, which they incorrectly have been reporting as "skyrocketing", "surging", and similar, etc....re-read my Booklets on 'verbiage used'....rates are, as predicted herein first, up a bit, but remain way lower than a while ago, ay ? but, of course, they never mentioned that....dgms.... 2) and, in perfect "PSYCLE sm" behavior, not until Thu. am, did CNBC run an interview, with the grabber, "Airline stocks have been big losers lately, but some analysts see better flight ahead" (their stupid puns, re-read my Media Booklet) - perfect, as you have been taught, ay ? first, Airlione stocks have been way UP, not down lately, yes ? and, second, as usual, only after such a dead-cat-bounce-predicted-perfectly-only-by-me-first- herein, do some ignorant, mostly-late/wrong over[aid/overrated analysts who loved them from tops (when I was, as usual, the first/only to PUT them herein for you), even begin to get less bearish, dig ? the pattern NEVER changes ! learn it, and use it....

3) and, Thu., CNBC's Bill Griffeth (dgms), 9:30, did a little useless story on 'learning the lessons from Enron's rise and fall", which was, as usual, BS, late, and not helpfuul, and he even ignorantly suggested that many investors might 'earn something' from their unnecessarily terrible experience....YOU and I know, that human nature and physics and (re)actions, and/or lack of (re)actions, will NEVER change, which is why we outperform most everyone else so often....good for us, always bad for millions of other nice people who could be helped by my output, but whom the country and industry has prevented thgem from garnering....'nuff said....

c) more incorrect/misleading/sensationalized, and/or improper comments, from Fundamentalists/Companies, newspapers/magazines, etc., vs. illogical/Contrary/Unlinkable, past/present/future Economic items, and/or stock price moves:
1) in the latest BS, I have noticed, recent VL report highlighted USON, over $ 6+, as a super-buy, which was OK, I guess, until I noticerd in same issue, large USON insider buying in that stock - just B4 VL's report on it came out, dig ? isn't/wasn't this immoral or illegal ? ....2) a little item while on vacation, I saw 3 major newspapers headline, Wed. 21st, "stocks retreat as investors take profits", as total BS....first, because, stocks ROSE the next 2 days bigger, and second, "investors" NEVER bought the lows, as we did, in the first place, dig ? next.... 3) similarly, Wash. Post same day, headline, "Poor earnings did not prevent recent big stocks price bounces....post-attack rally is a real puzzle", proves my "PSYCLE sm" yet again....the 95 % DON'T know mush of anything....nothing new here....'nuff said....

4) and recent Wash. Post Nov. 21st, cited a recent poll, which, again, showed less than 40 % of people know even the most basic stuff about stocks, bonds, investing, interest rates, borrowing, etc. only 27 % of people got even 50 % of their basic Questions correct, compared to 35 % in their similar poll in 1998....so what else is new....for the upteenth time, the patterns and basicsof the world NEVER change....

d) more, likely late, incorrect, and/or misleading, comments, from Brokerage firms, NL writers, Analysts, economists, Money Managers, etc.:
1) as I view ENE falling towards $ 1.00, recall, I was among the first/only to give out herein as a Put near top, gave it out herein on one of its two nice rallies on the way down in stages as taught, then had a QSL recently around 11, then correctly removed it, no sweat....but more, we have yet another in a huge list of overpaid/overrated analyusts being so wrong and missing easily-seen, should-have-been-seen fundamentals within this co., with no retribution to those analysts who all but lived in the co., and also failed to cut losses all the way down (just as with hundreds of techs recently, and thousands similarly over the years past, but I digress), dig ? and, of course, tons of innicent-but-should-could-have-known-better employees had too much ENE stock in their ignorant pension plans, with no stops, etc., dgms....I would have saved these people also, billions, unnecessarily....so what else is new....re-read my booklets.... this again does nothing to help investors worldwide learn my "PSYCLE sm"....

2) for years, I have avoided this, but with all I heard from her (why is she overly-on CNBC so often ? dgms) comments made Thu. on CNBC, I gotta whack Suzie orman, as way-fuller-of-herself-then-any of us have ever been, and her smart-assy comments of little help, especially to all the bagholders in Enron (dgms), to the point of her actually counselling a foreign guy weho said he bt. 100,000 ENE at $ 55, he should "definitely sell and take the loss if outside a pension plan", iwas terrible....he can only write-off net $ 3K/year, right ? and, as with every single overrated financial person in any Media at any time in all past years, she never showed a parabolic chart, did not explain anything about IGR, nor stop-loss, etc. shame on her, I now wonder if she will end up as the latest "Venita van Caspel" (dgms)....I am sure some of her stuff has some value, and wish her well, but....

e) more general, political, misreported items proving why one should probably ignore 95 % of everything else out there:
1) well, seeing tons of 'for sale' signs in my upper-class neighborhood, as expected.... 2) recent reports of the USA looking to 'fill national oil reserve amid energy supply glut', showed exactly where our reserves are - giving yet more strategic info. to our enemies....as CNN has been doing for weeks since 9/11, amazing, huh....current reserves, FYI, are about 544mm barrels of oil, enuf to replace about 50-60 days of imports....they will buy slowly and steadily into 2003, to get that # up to 700 mm barrels....may actually be a decent idea, given recent lowish oil prices....and more Middle East crap likely, forward....

3) semi-rare-kudos to the L.A. times, for recently (though again real/too late, and uselessly, as usual), citing how 'low I.R.'s are bad for savers and MM fund incomes falling much lower", etc. - as I have taught for decades, there are 2 sides to the I.R. coin....and neither helps investor much....one, (semi-usurous) credit card rates NEVER fall much, really, and people who cannot afford stuff still get screwed by c.c. issuers, and I still don't understand how banks or finl. institutions lose money on them, especially when rates are so low, and, two, people holding MM funds, get lower and lower returns when rates fall, yes ? God forbid anyone should help investors to lock-in higher rates, at htose tijmes, of help you into stocks near lows, right ? sure, some fortunate people who intially overpaid on their mtg. rates (get it ?), earlier, may be able to refinance at times, but most people cannot....'nuff said....dgms....

So, as you have seen, for years now, how well one does, often, just "doing" the best 'individual' stocks, and rotating Ind. Groups, chart-technically, and sentiment-wise, mostly long-side, while ignoring, or going contrary to, 95 % of all Media messages, and "indexes/averages" comments, from the peanut gallery ? By just getting my output, alone, you do much better, and save time, by not having to even try to "seek, and process" tons of other, useless fundamental info., anyway....and we also help remove potential emotional problems for you, before they begin....

3) Most recent Hypothetical "PSYCLE sm" transactions, to be mimicked, and referred back to:

Always remember to view "1-year-at-least past" charts of everything you can view, herein, along with their 200 day moving averages (DMA's), to "see/learn" the "PSYCLE patterns", and see where/when stocks in section (3) were Hypothetically bought near lows, and put near highs....all % percentage 'Gains' are just logical ESTIMATES for L.T., ITM options, where exist, and/or on Margin, where no options exist....