1) "PSYCLE SENSE sm": new:

More proof of the value of non-linking: NO one out there (besides me, of course) has mentioned that the 'I.R.' (on the T-bond) has Fallen from 5.75 % to 5.15 % recently, which, only according to 'the 95 %', is 'always supposed to be super-bullish for all stocks', right ? Gee, then how could so many Techs and non-techs have ALSO Fallen so much so fast ? dig ? next....

Getting more QLG's to more than overbalance some QSL's, longside....finding more depresssed buys, which, again, confirms broadening out of future potential upside, after recently-declined stocks back and fill and base, etc., an ongoing process this time of year....remember, with 'the 95%', "it's always something", i.e., there is ALWAYS a crisis or 'story' around....now that 'the losers' are no longer ignorantly worried about an election which does not matter (after all, they got killed staying in extended stocks WHILE they worried, on hindsight....don't get me started on the 'denial/psychological nuances' there, re-read my "mastering Psychology" booklet), and, now, refuse to buy depresseds on 'new' fears about 'an economic slowdown'....for the upteenth time, it never ends for 'the masses'.... either in denial, not selling anywhere near tops because they refuse to acknowledge parabolic patterns or likely coming roughness, or in denial near lows, refusing to acknowledge seasonality and/or oversoldness....

The patterns rarely change, as you have learned....but YOU, of course, are above all that, which is why you only buy low, use stops, remove all emotional reactions, and short near tops, most of the time, saving tons of time and effort the others are wasting, yes ? note larger section (3) long buys list....

2) "What's Been Said, and What I've Read":

a) Important Industry Group (Rotation) notes:
1) as I have been intimating since I was first to give them out from basing lows herein for you, many Regional Bank stocks still look real good.... 2) and, as a real 'shot', some of those super-depressed Asbestos-hit stocks are being re-added in section (6) below, should be fine from here L.T., interestingly, all had high Insider Buying.... 3) and we got yet two morw takeovers, as FFD merges with CD (which we are also watching, hmmmm) around $ 15. cash, see and learn from its previous easy base, neat, huh....and DK, though we got stopped out early, taken over over $ 8.... 4) not only do Trans. and Util. indexes look toppy again recently, the NYSE's 10-day A/D ovbt./ovsld. index does as well....what does that tell you ?

5) also note, I added more busted previously-big-name Tech. stocks buyable, in section (6) below....I will, as usual, be the first/only to have added some busted Semi. stocks from recent lows, long, yes ? hope you got some.... 6) note, added more Health-relateds as Puttables in section (3) and (7) below.... interesting, as usual, because many non-experts who fled into them only up near highs because they had lost $ being wrong in Techs from tops which they did not predict, are now gonna give more $ back, and fail to buy the now-depressed Techs, dig ? the pattern rarely changes....Also, the DJ. 'defensive' index looks S.T. toppy as well, with the Food/Bev./Tobacco/Def. stocks in it....as I am, again, the first/only person to point out herein for you ....7) our even having some QSL's to go along with a bunch of QLG's in their Puts and Calls over the years, I still do not like the Insurance stocks up here, and most remain potentially bearish, as usual, into 'high RS'....note, even as I.R.'s supposedly fall, which, as explained elsewhere, canNOT be automatically 'linked'....last, as taught you in my "I.G.R." booklet, Banks can rise, as Insur. stocks fall, right ? they are NOT automatically connected, dig ? last, remember, Tops in Financial stocks are often accompanied by 'fakeout breakouts', yes ? so be aware....

b) more, misleading, sensationalized, Late, and/or improper/incorrect comments from the Financial Media, Reporters, etc.:
1) in a rare, potentially helpful item, Fri., CNBC 12:40, B. Pisani showed I.R. drop T-bond from 2/99 at 6.75 % to now at 5.35 %, and similar I.R. drop, from early to late 1998, after the Asian crisis low.....interesting, huh ? ....2) finally, the WSJ, 12/12, publishes a negative article on MSFT's woes - only after its stock fell already from 120 to under 50, yes ? ditto, same issue, onour WCOM, down from 60+ to 15+....and, as CSCO falls even furthery (recall me being among the very few to call its top herein for you), I, again, just laugh...."but, Jim, you just don't understand....Cisco is bulletproof....no fundamental risk....THE company to own....leader of the free world...." yadda, yadda, as usual, the pattern rarely changes....next....

c) more incorrect/misleading/sensationalized, and/or improper comments, from Fundamentalists/Companies, newspapers/magazines, etc., vs. illogical/Contrary/Unlinkable, past/present/future stock price moves:
1) amazingly, big greedy ignorant guys within TWX, Mon., on CNBC 9:05, actually said, "we're not concerned with recent Movie flops....that is just part of the inherent cyclical nature of the business...." which is interesting, since, if the have been aware of such 'cycles', why didn't they NOT put 'losing films' out in the first place, dig ? .... 2) those who never predicted it, cite recent Calif. Elec. costs as the quivalent of Crude Oil costing $ 350. bbl., gee, no greed there, and great prior planning within that industry, ay ? of further proof of corporate greed, 'Bonneville power' has HAD plenty of 'energy' to send Calif.'s way for months now, and still does - but it cites 'fear of upsetting salmon run' in not doing so - yet....yup, total BS....when the price is high enuf, they will sell Calif. all it needs, dig ? no gouging there, ay ? next.....

3) recent WSJ said, in order to achieve their financial goals in merger, AOL/TWX will have to slash costs, layoff thousands of people, etc., don't getme started....I continue to be against this further-monopoly....what a shame....

d) more, likely late, incorrect, and/or misleading, comments, from Brokerage firms, NL writers, Analysts, economists, Money Managers, etc.:
1) more previously-very-incorrect B-firms continue to lower their opinions on tons of already-fell-a-ton Tech. stocks.... amazing that no one calls them on the carpet, ay ? the Media (most often their puppets) just matter-of-factly reports them....to the detriment of millions of nice people.... 2) re-read my "scenarios/reasons" booklet: now I hear that some Bond bulls are hoping the Fed does NOT lower I.R.'s, supposedly "because we would continue to have the conditions during which the T-bond has been rising"....for the umpteenth time, this is BS....they want rates to fall, so the economy holds up, but also want rates not to fall, so Bonds keep rising ? yet, as I mentioned before, herein, recently most stocks FELL as rates fell, the exact opposite of what the 'experts' have been intimating for decades, yes ? all a waste of brain use, ay ? next....

e) more general items proving why one should probably ignore 95 % of everything else out there:
1) not only have the recent Baseball signings/contracts signallyed bad stuff, I just heard an ATT commercial, saying, "After all, aren't the holidays all about getting what you want ?", as damning a non-yogic statement as i have heard, yes ? and part of the reason why I said 2 years ago here, that many 'lucky yuppies' were due to get their come=uppance to an extent --- which, to an extent, has occured....perhaps some day human nature will change, but it certainly has not happened yet.... 2) did you know that our modern word "paradigm" comes from the Greek word for 'pattern' ? hmmmm....actually, kind of a compliment, for us, yes ?

3) more signs of 'deterioration' of the system: Many Calif. schools decided to stop drug testing urinalysis of athletes, acknowledging 'big drug problem existing', but citing 'costs too much', and, 'drug testing ignores alcohol, which is a bigger problem', which is true - but exactly what are they doing about alcohol ? not much, ay ? next.... 4) recent L.A.T. editorial, correctly pointing out that, tons of past Baseball teams with huge payrolls, did not automatically win, and many low payrolls, especially in recent years, HAVE won divisions, etc., proving my 'no links' concept yet again..... 5) saw a funny cartoon, showing Bush saying, "I want an even bigger voctory in 2004, maybe 6 to 3 or 7 to 2 !" hah....oy.... 6) also saw item in parade Mag., citing Saddam hussein building huge new playgrounds, palaces, stadiums, amusement parks, advanced communication systems, 625 new homes for his posse, having huge parties every week, etc., even as his public people face water and food shortages....so what else is new, ay ? Boy, we really hurt him, didn't we ? not.

So, as you have seen, for years now, how well one does, often, just "doing" the best 'individual' stocks, and rotating Ind. Groups, chart-technically, and sentiment-wise, mostly long-side, while ignoring, or going contrary to, 95 % of all Media messages, and "indexes/averages" comments, from the peanut gallery ? By just getting my output, alone, you do much better, and save time, by not having to even try to "seek, and process" tons of other, useless fundamental info., anyway....and we also help remove potential emotional problems for you, before they begin....

3) Most recent Hypothetical "PSYCLE sm" transactions, to be mimicked, and referred back to:

Always remember to view "1-year-at-least past" charts of everything you can view, herein, along with their 200 day moving averages (DMA's), to "see/learn" the "PSYCLE patterns", and see where/when stocks in section (3) were Hypothetically bought near lows, and put near highs....all % percentage 'Gains' are just logical ESTIMATES for L.T., ITM options, where exist, and/or on Margin, where no options exist....